Reviews in Aquaculture

886 papers and 40.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 886 papers published in Reviews in Aquaculture in the last decades have received a total of 40.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Reviews in Aquaculture usually cover Aquatic Science (503 papers), Immunology (359 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (223 papers) specifically the topics of Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (454 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (342 papers) and Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (190 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reviews in Aquaculture are Mahmoud A.O. Dawood, Brett Glencross, Wing‐Keong Ng, Shunsuke Koshio, Giovanni M. Turchini, Abdel‐Fattah M. El‐Sayed, Bente E. Torstensen, Andrea C. Alfaro, M.C.J. Verdegem and María Ángeles Esteban.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reviews in Aquaculture

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reviews in Aquaculture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reviews in Aquaculture.

Countries where authors publish in Reviews in Aquaculture

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reviews in Aquaculture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reviews in Aquaculture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reviews in Aquaculture more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025