Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

2.1k papers and 65.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education in the last decades have received a total of 65.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education usually cover Education (1.7k papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (210 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (178 papers) specifically the topics of Student Assessment and Feedback (986 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (894 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (469 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education are David Boud, Duncan David Nulty, D. Royce Sadler, David Nicol, David Carless, John T. E. Richardson, Hamish Coates, Nancy Falchikov, Elizabeth Molloy and Chris Park.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.

Countries where authors publish in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025