Current Neuropharmacology

1.6k papers and 60.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Current Neuropharmacology in the last decades have received a total of 60.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Neuropharmacology usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (507 papers), Molecular Biology (498 papers) and Physiology (335 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (277 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (165 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (124 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Neuropharmacology are Ritu Mahajan, Ajay Singh, Paolo Zamboni, Eric R. Samuels, E. Szabadi, Danijela Krstić, Vesna Vasić, Mirjana B. Čolović, Tamara Lazarević‐Pašti and Aleksandra M. Bondžić.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Neuropharmacology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Neuropharmacology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Neuropharmacology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Neuropharmacology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Neuropharmacology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Neuropharmacology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Neuropharmacology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025