Journal of Aging Studies

1.3k papers and 30.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Journal of Aging Studies in the last decades have received a total of 30.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Aging Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (598 papers), Demography (416 papers) and General Health Professions (401 papers) specifically the topics of Aging and Gerontology Research (363 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (332 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (242 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Aging Studies are Stephen Katz, Julia Twigg, Kyu‐taik Sung, G. Clare Wenger, Neil Selwyn, Paula Gardner, Deborah O’Connor, Stephen M. Golant, Lars Tornstam and Toni Calasanti.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Aging Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Aging Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Aging Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Aging Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Aging Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Aging Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Aging Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025