The International Journal of Aging and Human Development

46.6k citations

2.1k papers · indexed · active since 1950

Sociology and Political Science top 5%
Health top 1%
Social Psychology top 5%
General Health Professions top 5%
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology top 0.2%

Fields: Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (657 papers)Health (573 papers)Demography (479 papers)
Topics: Aging and Gerontology ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Top scholars: Jeffrey Dean Webster Neal Krause Iris Chi Kee‐Lee Chou Ann Bowling Benny Barak Bradley J. Fisher Anne Shumway‐Cook

In The Last Decade

The International Journal of Aging and Human Development

1.9k papers receiving 41.9k citations

Peers

Sociology and Political Science 13.9k
Health 11.8k
Social Psychology 11.1k
General Health Professions 10.9k
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10.1k

Replace Research on Aging with:

Research on Aging United States

Journal of Aging and Health United States

Ageing and Society United Kingdom

Educational Gerontology United States

Journal of Aging Studies United States

Journal of Applied Gerontology United States

International Journal of Behavioral Development United States

Journal of Social Issues United States

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships United States

Clinical Gerontologist United States

The International Journal of Aging and Human Development relative to Research on Aging United States Research on Aging's profile →

Citations per field

00.5×1.5×1.8×

Research on Aging · 1×

×0.7 14k/19k

SPS

×0.6 12k/19k

HEALT

×1.4 11k/8k

SP

×0.7 11k/16k

GHP

×1.8 10k/6k

NPP

Citations per year

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Countries where authors publish in The International Journal of Aging and Human Development

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The International Journal of Aging and Human Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The International Journal of Aging and Human Development more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The International Journal of Aging and Human Development

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The International Journal of Aging and Human Development.

About The International Journal of Aging and Human Development

The 2.1k papers published in The International Journal of Aging and Human Development in the last decades have received a total of 46.6k indexed citations . Papers published in The International Journal of Aging and Human Development usually cover Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (657 papers), Health (573 papers) and Demography (479 papers) specifically the topics of Aging and Gerontology Research (657 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (527 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (401 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The International Journal of Aging and Human Development are Jeffrey Dean Webster, Neal Krause, Iris Chi, Kee‐Lee Chou, Ann Bowling, Benny Barak, Bradley J. Fisher, Anne Shumway‐Cook, Lewis M. Nashner and Marjorie Woollacott.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact