Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology

872 papers and 14.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 872 papers published in Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology in the last decades have received a total of 14.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (403 papers), Health (280 papers) and General Health Professions (250 papers) specifically the topics of Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (287 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (245 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (173 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology are Sjaak van der Geest, John Knodel, Sandra Torres, Erdman Palmore, Angelique Chan, Neena L. Chappell, G. Clare Wenger, Kalyani K. Mehta, Maria G. Cattell and Sue E. Levkoff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025