Review of General Psychology

About

The 858 papers published in Review of General Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 83.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of General Psychology usually cover Social Psychology (397 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (248 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (219 papers) specifically the topics of Cultural Differences and Values (113 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (94 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of General Psychology are James J. Gross, Raymond S. Nickerson, Barbara L. Fredrickson, Stevan E. Hobfoll, Roy F. Baumeister, Kathleen D. Vohs, Dan P. McAdams, Ellen Bratslavsky, Catrin Finkenauer and Robert J. Sternberg.

In The Last Decade

Review of General Psychology

804 papers receiving 75.3k citations

Peers

Review of General Psychology
Comparison fields: 5 of 222
  • Social Psychology 31.3k
  • Sociology and Political Science 22.6k
  • Clinical Psychology 22.3k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 17.6k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 11.0k
Replace Psychological Inquiry with:
Psychological Inquiry United States
European Journal of Personality United States
Social and Personality Psychology Compass United States
Perspectives on Psychological Science United States
Human Communication Research United States
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy United States
The Journal of Positive Psychology United States
Organizational Research Methods United States
Sociological Methods & Research United States
Social Cognition United States
Psychological Inquiry United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Review of General Psychology
Review of General Psychology · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Review of General Psychology
Review of General Psychology · 1×

Countries where authors publish in Review of General Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of General Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of General Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of General Psychology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Review of General Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of General Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of General Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026