Clinical Gerontologist

1.5k papers and 26.3k indexed citations

About

The 1.5k papers published in Clinical Gerontologist in the last decades have received a total of 26.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Gerontologist usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (528 papers), Clinical Psychology (462 papers) and General Health Professions (441 papers) specifically the topics of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (408 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (248 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (235 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Gerontologist are Jerome A. Yesavage, Javaid I. Sheikh, Linda Teri, Lenore Sawyer Radloff, David Haber, T. L. Brink, Terrence L. Rose, Philip H. Heersema, Peter A. Lichtenberg and Kam Weng Boey.

In The Last Decade

Clinical Gerontologist

1.3k papers receiving 24.3k citations

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Gerontologist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Gerontologist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Gerontologist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Gerontologist more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Clinical Gerontologist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Gerontologist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Gerontologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026