Countries where authors publish in Petroleum Chemistry
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Petroleum Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Petroleum Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Petroleum Chemistry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Petroleum Chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Petroleum Chemistry.
About Petroleum Chemistry
The 2.1k papers published in Petroleum Chemistry in the last decades have received a total of 13.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Petroleum Chemistry usually cover Catalysis (528 papers), Fuel Technology (54 papers) and Analytical Chemistry (449 papers) specifically the topics of Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (453 papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (434 papers), Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (369 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (362 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (314 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (270 papers), Catalysts for Methane Reforming (215 papers) and Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (145 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Petroleum Chemistry are С. Н. Хаджиев, А. Л. Максимов, Э. А. Караханов, Н. В. Колесниченко, А. К. Головко, A. B. Yaroslavtsev, Г. Н. Гордадзе, A. L. Maximov, І. І. Іванова and E. Yu. Safronova.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.