This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forest Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forest Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forest Systems more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Forest Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forest Systems.
About Forest Systems
The 1.1k papers published in Forest Systems in the last decades have received a total of 10.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Forest Systems usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (526 papers), Global and Planetary Change (387 papers), Forestry (51 papers), Insect Science (143 papers) and Plant Science (338 papers) specifically the topics of Forest ecology and management (444 papers), Forest Management and Policy (186 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (123 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (121 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (109 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (96 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (92 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (91 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forest Systems are G. Montero, Miren del Rı́o, Ricardo Ruíz‐Peinado, Isabel Cañellas, Felipe Bravo, Ricardo Alı́a, Margarida Tomé, Hans Pretzsch, Luis Gil and Gregorio Montero.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.