This map shows the geographic impact of Yusuf Koç's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yusuf Koç with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yusuf Koç more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yusuf Koç. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yusuf Koç. The network helps show where Yusuf Koç may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Yusuf Koç
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Yusuf Koç.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Yusuf Koç based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Yusuf Koç. Yusuf Koç is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Koç, Yusuf, et al.. (2017). Four different ways to build a chatbot about movies. Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences).
Koç, Yusuf, et al.. (2014). In vitro Koşullarda Humik Maddelerin Kolza Bitkisinin Fizyolojik Özellikleri, Sürgün Rejenerasyonu ve Antioksidant Enzim Aktiviteleri Üzerine Etkisi. 7(1). 55–61.1 indexed citations
8.
Koç, Yusuf, et al.. (2013). Investigation of Using Online Video Case Discussions in Teacher Education: Sources of Evidence of Mathematics Learning.. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice. 13(2). 1295–1303.4 indexed citations
Koç, Yusuf, et al.. (2012). Investigating First Year Elementary Mathematics Teacher Education Students' Knowledge of Prism. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice. 12(4). 2949–2952.17 indexed citations
11.
Koç, Yusuf, et al.. (2012). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenlerinin Yeni İlköğretim Matematik Dersi Programı Hakkındaki Görüşleri. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 11(3). 715–736.2 indexed citations
12.
Koç, Yusuf, et al.. (2012). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin prizma kavramına dair bilgilerinin incelenmesi. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice. 12(4). 2941–2952.8 indexed citations
Işıksal, Mine, et al.. (2010). A Study on Investigating Eight Grade Students' Reasoning Skills on Measurement: The Case of Cylinder. 35(156). 61–70.4 indexed citations
15.
Koç, Yusuf, et al.. (2010). The Portrayals of Individuals with Physical and Sensory Impairments in Picture Books.. International Journal of Special Education (IJSE). 25(1). 145–161.1 indexed citations
Koç, Yusuf, Mine Işıksal, & Safure Bulut. (2007). Elementary school curriculum reform in Turkey. International education journal. 8(1). 30–39.38 indexed citations
18.
Alkan, Feray, et al.. (2004). Evaluation of the Schirmer Tear Test in two Turkish breeds of Shepherd dogs. Revue Méd Vét. 155(2). 67–70.7 indexed citations
19.
Koç, Yusuf, Rebecca McGraw, Kathleen Lynch, & Catherine Brown. (2002). The Use of a Web-Based Professional Development Forum to Enhance In-service and Pre-service Teacher Education. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2002(1). 780–782.1 indexed citations
20.
McGraw, Rebecca, et al.. (2002). Talking about Mathematics Teaching: An Examination of the Use of a Multimedia Case To Stimulate the Conversation.. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. 2002(1).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.