Wing Lam

1.3k citations
28 papers · 588 indexed · h-index 12

Wing Lam

26 papers receiving 551 citations

Peers

Wing Lam
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Pharmacology 193
  • Spectroscopy 121
  • Pharmaceutical Science 26
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 60
  • Analytical Chemistry 34
Replace Cathaline den Besten with:
Cathaline den Besten Netherlands
J.C. Ramsey United States
Ulrike Bernauer Germany
Deirdre A. Mahle United States
John S. Dutcher United States
Warren W. Ku United States
Jaroslav Mráz Czechia
Masayoshi Yoshikawa Japan
R.J. Nolan United States
Ulrike Pabel Germany
Wing Lam relative to Cathaline den Besten Netherlands Cathaline den Besten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Cathaline den Besten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wing Lam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wing Lam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wing Lam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wing Lam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wing Lam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wing Lam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wing Lam. The network helps show where Wing Lam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wing Lam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wing Lam Line = papers co-authored together Wing Lam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20235
2 201818
3 201766
4 20126
5 200986
6 20075
7 200716
8 200556
9 200436
10 19953
11
Physical structure of the primary froth from oil sand extraction: Cryogenic sampling and microscopic observations of froth from commercial extraction plants
19951
12 19947
13 199316
14 199321
15 19921
16 199221
17 19920
18 19913
19 19897
20 19851

About Wing Lam

Wing Lam is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Analytical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 588 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (4 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (3 papers), Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (3 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (3 papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (3 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (193 citations), Spectroscopy (121 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (26 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (60 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (34 citations). Wing Lam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Ragu Ramanathan, Abdul Mutlib, John E. Casida, Joan M. Kelly, Sabrina X. Zhao, R. Scott Obach, Amit S. Kalgutkar, R.J. Mikula, Paul Galatsis and Daniel C. Conrad. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Acta Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure Communications, Chemical Research in Toxicology, Fuel Science and Technology International and ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026