Cathaline den Besten

1.0k citations
22 papers · 695 indexed · h-index 17

Cathaline den Besten

21 papers receiving 663 citations

Peers

Cathaline den Besten
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Pharmacology 114
  • Chemical Health and Safety 5
  • Biochemistry 45
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 75
  • Molecular Biology 346
Replace A. Gescher with:
A. Gescher United Kingdom
L T Burka United States
W. Griffith Humphreys United States
Tamio Mizutani Japan
Igor Linhart Czechia
Sherry R. Black United States
Donald E. Nerland United States
Douglas Caudill United States
Fumiaki Shono Japan
C.A. Tyson United States
Cathaline den Besten relative to A. Gescher United Kingdom A. Gescher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
A. Gescher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cathaline den Besten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cathaline den Besten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathaline den Besten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathaline den Besten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cathaline den Besten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathaline den Besten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathaline den Besten. The network helps show where Cathaline den Besten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cathaline den Besten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cathaline den Besten Line = papers co-authored together Cathaline den Besten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 201922
3
QR-421a, an antisense oligonucleotide, for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa due to USH2A exon 13 mutations
20198
4 201919
5 201941
6 201795
7 201343
8 201121
9 199746
10 19957
11 199414
12 199421
13 199336
14 199228
15 199175
16 199122
17 199017
18 198917
19
Glutathione conjugation as a toxication reaction.
19882
20
Body fat distribution and the prognosis for weight reduction: preliminary observations.
198834

About Cathaline den Besten

Cathaline den Besten is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Transplantation and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (8 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (4 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (2 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (2 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (114 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (5 citations) and Biochemistry (45 citations). Cathaline den Besten has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. van Bladeren, Ivonne M.C.M. Rietjens, Greet Vansant, Paul Deurenberg, JA Weststrate, Ben van Ommen, Robert P. Hanzlik, Rudolf B. Beems, R.M.E. Vos and Franz Müller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026