Willoughby Moloney
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Research and Theory top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Gordon W. CheungMatthew ParsonsPeter BoxallStephen D. JacobsEmma MoselenDes GormanAnna KingRobyn Dixon
- Topics
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers)Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthJournal of Advanced NursingHuman Resources for Health
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Willoughby Moloney
10 papers receiving 285 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- General Health Professions 235
- Clinical Psychology 87
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 80
- Research and Theory 49
- Sociology and Political Science 36
Countries citing papers authored by Willoughby Moloney
This map shows the geographic impact of Willoughby Moloney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Willoughby Moloney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Willoughby Moloney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Willoughby Moloney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Willoughby Moloney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Willoughby Moloney. The network helps show where Willoughby Moloney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Willoughby Moloney
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Willoughby Moloney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Willoughby Moloney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Willoughby Moloney. Willoughby Moloney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 50 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | Which factors influence new Zealand registered nurses to leave their profession | 7 |
| 10 | 188 |
About Willoughby Moloney
Willoughby Moloney is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (49 citations), Leadership and Management (20 citations) and General Health Professions (235 citations). Willoughby Moloney has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gordon W. Cheung, Matthew Parsons, Peter Boxall, Stephen D. Jacobs, Emma Moselen, Des Gorman, Anna King, Robyn Dixon, Nicolette Sheridan and Natalie Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Human Resources for Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.