Human Resources for Health

1.3k papers and 39.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Human Resources for Health in the last decades have received a total of 39.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Human Resources for Health usually cover General Health Professions (748 papers), Emergency Medical Services (637 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (479 papers) specifically the topics of Global Health Workforce Issues (608 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (474 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (243 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Resources for Health are Gilles Dussault, Delanyo Dovlo, Maria Cristina Franceschini, Rubin Pillay, Helen Schneider, Mário Roberto Dal Poz, Inke Mathauer, Marjolein Dieleman, Peter Griffiths and Mike Callaghan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Human Resources for Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Resources for Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Resources for Health.

Countries where authors publish in Human Resources for Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Resources for Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Resources for Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Resources for Health more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025