Nicolette Sheridan

2.2k citations
79 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 20

Nicolette Sheridan

77 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Nicolette Sheridan
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • General Health Professions 824
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 68
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 22
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 67
  • Occupational Therapy 54
Replace Joke Haafkens with:
Joke Haafkens Netherlands
Laura Desveaux Canada
Bertil Marklund Sweden
Kihye Han South Korea
Katja Goetz Germany
Carol P. Vojir United States
Louise Wiles Australia
Trisha Dunning Australia
Valerio Dimonte Italy
Jane B Lemaire Canada
Nicolette Sheridan relative to Joke Haafkens Netherlands Joke Haafkens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Joke Haafkens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolette Sheridan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolette Sheridan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolette Sheridan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolette Sheridan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolette Sheridan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolette Sheridan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolette Sheridan. The network helps show where Nicolette Sheridan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicolette Sheridan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicolette Sheridan Line = papers co-authored together Nicolette Sheridan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 20227
4 20217
5 20213
6 20205
7 201944
8 201815
9
Which factors influence new Zealand registered nurses to leave their profession
20177
10 201716
11 201725
12 20162
13 20152
14 201328
15 20138
16 201351
17 201215
18
Health Reality Show: Regular Celebrities, High Stakes, New Game. Integrated care in two general practices: a future model for managing complex patients in primary health care
20090
19 2002212
20 19781

About Nicolette Sheridan

Nicolette Sheridan is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (23 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (17 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (11 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (9 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (6 papers) and Respiratory viral infections research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (824 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (68 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (22 citations). Nicolette Sheridan has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Kenealy, John Parsons, Ann McKillop, R Norton, Mark Woodward, Carolyn Coggan, Marlene Fransen, Deborah Raphael, Walter P. Wodchis and Paul Rouse. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Spine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026