William Wolf

99 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

William Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 188
  • General Psychology 45
  • Food Science 580
  • Organic Chemistry 691
  • Virology 88
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 273
Replace Graham Jamieson with:
Graham Jamieson United States
Keiko Kashiwagi Japan
Robert E. Campbell Canada
Laurent Boyer France
Noriko Nakamura Japan
Keiji Terao Japan
David M. Lawson United Kingdom
Stephen W. White United States
Richard C. Page United States
Kiyoshi Ikeda Japan
William Wolf relative to Graham Jamieson United States Graham Jamieson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Graham Jamieson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Wolf. The network helps show where William Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Wolf Line = papers co-authored together William Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20243
2 2017191
3 2013198
4 20014
5 20006
6 200054
7 199985
8 199229
9 199165
10 1990199
11
Synthesis and comparative biodistribution of the desferrioxamine-human serum albumin (DF-HSA) conjugates prepared with various methods.
19881
12
[Effect of diet and exercise therapy on body weight, performance and lipid metabolism of post-infarct patients during a 4-week rehabilitation program].
19861
13 19742
14
Denaturation of soybean proteins by isoelectric precipitation
197114
15 19707
16 19680
17 19672
18 19666
19 195711
20 19535

About William Wolf

William Wolf is a scholar working on General Psychology, Food Science, Clinical Psychology, Biotechnology and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 107 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (15 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (13 papers), Phytase and its Applications (10 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (7 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (7 papers), Phytoestrogen effects and research (6 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (6 papers) and Food composition and properties (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (45 citations), Food Science (580 citations), Organic Chemistry (691 citations), Virology (88 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (273 citations). William Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include F. Dean Toste, Matthew S. Winston, David Briggs, J. J. Rackis, A. K. Smith, Robert H. Grubbs, Aud Nome Dueland, Ravi Mahalingam, Randall J. Cohrs and Mary Wellish. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, Journal of the American Chemical Society, American Journal of Psychotherapy and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026