William W. Freehling
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Marketing top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Merrill D. PetersonRoy F. NicholsJohn C. InscoeMark TushnetCarl N. DeglerRobert McColleyRonald TakakiWillie Lee Rose
- Topics
- American Constitutional Law and Politics (23 papers)American History and Culture (8 papers)Race, History, and American Society (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William W. Freehling
29 papers receiving 197 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Political Science and International Relations 221
- Sociology and Political Science 163
- Marketing 133
- Anthropology 68
- Economics and Econometrics 57
Countries citing papers authored by William W. Freehling
This map shows the geographic impact of William W. Freehling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William W. Freehling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William W. Freehling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William W. Freehling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William W. Freehling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William W. Freehling. The network helps show where William W. Freehling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William W. Freehling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William W. Freehling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William W. Freehling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William W. Freehling. William W. Freehling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Showdown in Virginia: The 1861 Convention and the Fate of the Union | 2 |
| 2 | Secessionists triumphant, 1854-1861 | 1 |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | A place not forgotten : landscapes of the South from the Morris Museum of Art | 0 |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 45 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | Secessionists at bay, 1776-1854 | 2 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Slavery and Freedom | 7 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | The nullification era : a documentary record | 6 |
| 20 | 5 |
About William W. Freehling
William W. Freehling is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Marketing and Anthropology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (23 papers), American History and Culture (8 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (133 citations), Political Science and International Relations (221 citations) and Anthropology (68 citations). William W. Freehling has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Merrill D. Peterson, Roy F. Nichols, John C. Inscoe, Mark Tushnet, Carl N. Degler, Robert McColley, Ronald Takaki, Willie Lee Rose, Lacy K. Ford and Brian Holden Reid. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and The Journal of Southern History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.