William W. Freehling

957 citations
37 papers · 369 indexed · h-index 11

William W. Freehling

29 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers

William W. Freehling
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Marketing 133
  • Political Science and International Relations 221
  • Anthropology 68
  • Cultural Studies 31
  • Sociology and Political Science 163
Replace William M. Wiecek with:
William M. Wiecek United States
Jane H. Pease United States
Richard R. Beeman United States
Pauline Maier United States
Brian Steel Wills United States
Betty Fladeland United States
Thomas B. Alexander United States
Herman Belz United States
Merton L. Dillon United States
Hendrik Hartog United States
William W. Freehling relative to William M. Wiecek United States William M. Wiecek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
William M. Wiecek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William W. Freehling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William W. Freehling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William W. Freehling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William W. Freehling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William W. Freehling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William W. Freehling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William W. Freehling. The network helps show where William W. Freehling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 15 scholars most cited alongside William W. Freehling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William W. Freehling Line = papers co-authored together William W. Freehling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Showdown in Virginia: The 1861 Convention and the Fate of the Union
20102
2
Secessionists triumphant, 1854-1861
20071
3 20075
4
20031
5 20022
6
A place not forgotten : landscapes of the South from the Morris Museum of Art
19990
7 199519
8 19910
9 199119
10 199145
11 19913
12
Secessionists at bay, 1776-1854
19902
13 19881
14 19834
15
Slavery and Freedom
19827
16 19781
17 197219
18 19703
19
The nullification era : a documentary record
19676
20 19655

About William W. Freehling

William W. Freehling is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Marketing and Anthropology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (23 papers), American History and Culture (8 papers), Race, History, and American Society (7 papers), Canadian Identity and History (5 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (3 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), European Political History Analysis (1 paper) and Photography and Visual Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (133 citations), Political Science and International Relations (221 citations) and Anthropology (68 citations). William W. Freehling has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Merrill D. Peterson, Roy F. Nichols, John C. Inscoe, Mark Tushnet, Carl N. Degler, Robert McColley, Ronald Takaki, Willie Lee Rose, Lacy K. Ford and Brian Holden Reid. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and The Journal of Southern History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026