This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Tushnet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Tushnet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Tushnet more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Tushnet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Tushnet. The network helps show where Mark Tushnet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Tushnet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Tushnet.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Tushnet based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Tushnet. Mark Tushnet is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tushnet, Mark. (2015). Internet Exceptionalism: An Overview from General Constitutional Law. William and Mary law review. 56(4). 1637.3 indexed citations
2.
Tushnet, Mark. (2013). Constitution-Making: An Introduction. Texas law review.9 indexed citations
3.
Tushnet, Mark. (2013). Popular Constitutionalism and Political Organization. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University). 18(1). 1.1 indexed citations
4.
Tushnet, Mark. (2012). New Comparative Constitutional Scholarship on Enforcing Second Generation Rights. 2012.
5.
Tushnet, Mark. (2011). Administrative Law in the 1930s: The Supreme Court's Accommodation of Progressive Legal Theory. Duke Law Journal. 60(7). 1565–1637.8 indexed citations
Tushnet, Mark. (2010). Academics as Law-Makers?. 29(1). 19.1 indexed citations
8.
Tushnet, Mark. (2009). The Inevitable Globalization of Constitutional Law. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University).17 indexed citations
9.
Tushnet, Mark. (2005). Controlling Executive Power in the War on Terrorism. Harvard Law Review. 118(8). 2673.9 indexed citations
10.
Tushnet, Mark. (2004). Social Welfare Rights and the Forms of Judicial Review. Texas law review. 82(7). 1895.38 indexed citations
11.
Tushnet, Mark. (2002). A Goldilocks Account of Judicial Review. USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco). 37(1). 5.1 indexed citations
12.
Jackson, Vicki C., Mark Tushnet, & William H. Rehnquist. (2002). Defining the field of comparative constitutional law. Praeger eBooks.15 indexed citations
13.
Tushnet, Mark. (2002). State Action, Social Welfare Rights, and the Judicial Role: Some Comparative Observations. Chicago journal of international law. 3(2). 13.5 indexed citations
14.
Tushnet, Mark. (1997). Constituting We the People. Fordham law review. 65(4). 1557.1 indexed citations
15.
Tushnet, Mark & Timothy Lynch. (1995). The Project of the Harvard Forewords: A Social and Intellectual Inquiry.. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota). 11(3). 463.1 indexed citations
Tushnet, Mark. (1994). Why the Supreme Court Overruled "National League of Cities". Vanderbilt law review. 47(5). 1623.1 indexed citations
18.
Tushnet, Mark. (1992). Civil Rights and Social Rights: The Future of the Reconstruction Amendments. Loyola of Los Angeles law review. 25(4). 1207.5 indexed citations
19.
Tushnet, Mark. (1987). The Concept of Tradition in Constitutional Historiography. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University). 29(1). 93.1 indexed citations
20.
Tushnet, Mark. (1983). H.L.A Hart. Cornell law review/The Cornell law quarterly. 68(2). 257–290.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.