Lacy K. Ford
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Marketing top 10%
- Anthropology
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- William CooperWilliam W. FreehlingAnn J. AbadieCharles W. EaglesDrew Gilpin FaustWilliam FerrisManisha SinhaWilliam G. Shade
- Topics
- American Constitutional Law and Politics (14 papers)Race, History, and American Society (13 papers)American History and Culture (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lacy K. Ford
21 papers receiving 74 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Political Science and International Relations 73
- Sociology and Political Science 67
- Marketing 54
- Anthropology 21
- Economics and Econometrics 21
Countries citing papers authored by Lacy K. Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of Lacy K. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lacy K. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lacy K. Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lacy K. Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lacy K. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lacy K. Ford. The network helps show where Lacy K. Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lacy K. Ford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lacy K. Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lacy K. Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lacy K. Ford. Lacy K. Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Democracy, Despotism, and Disunion: A Review Essay | 1 |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | Democracy and Its Consequences in Antebellum America: A Review Essay | 0 |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Is There a Southern Political Tradition | 2 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | Social origins of a new South Carolina : the upcountry in the nineteenth century | 1 |
About Lacy K. Ford
Lacy K. Ford is a scholar working on Marketing, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 139 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (14 papers), Race, History, and American Society (13 papers) and American History and Culture (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (54 citations), Political Science and International Relations (73 citations) and Anthropology (21 citations). Lacy K. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William Cooper, William W. Freehling, Ann J. Abadie, Charles W. Eagles, Drew Gilpin Faust, William Ferris, Manisha Sinha, William G. Shade, Charles Reagan Wilson and Bruce Clayton. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and The Journal of Economic History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.