Lacy K. Ford
- Marketing top 10%
- American History and Culture 11
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 14
- Political Theory and Influence 1
-
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade 2
- History top 10%
-
- Race, History, and American Society 13
- Canadian Identity and History 1
-
- Latin American and Latino Studies 1
-
- American Environmental and Regional History 1
- Co-authors
- William CooperWilliam W. FreehlingAnn J. AbadieCharles W. EaglesDrew Gilpin FaustWilliam FerrisManisha SinhaWilliam G. Shade
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (5 papers)Journal of American History (4 papers)The Journal of Economic History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lacy K. Ford
21 papers receiving 74 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Marketing 54
- Political Science and International Relations 73
- Anthropology 21
- History 16
- Sociology and Political Science 67
Countries citing papers authored by Lacy K. Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of Lacy K. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lacy K. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lacy K. Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lacy K. Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lacy K. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lacy K. Ford. The network helps show where Lacy K. Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Lacy K. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 3 | Democracy, Despotism, and Disunion: A Review Essay | 2010 | 1 |
| 4 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 5 | Democracy and Its Consequences in Antebellum America: A Review Essay | 2008 | 0 |
| 6 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 11 | Is There a Southern Political Tradition | 1996 | 2 |
| 12 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 28 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 20 | Social origins of a new South Carolina : the upcountry in the nineteenth century | 1986 | 1 |
About Lacy K. Ford
Lacy K. Ford is a scholar working on Marketing, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 139 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (14 papers), Race, History, and American Society (13 papers), American History and Culture (11 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers), Political Theory and Influence (1 paper), Latin American and Latino Studies (1 paper), Canadian Identity and History (1 paper) and American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (54 citations), Political Science and International Relations (73 citations) and Anthropology (21 citations). Lacy K. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William Cooper, William W. Freehling, Ann J. Abadie, Charles W. Eagles, Drew Gilpin Faust, William Ferris, Manisha Sinha, William G. Shade, Charles Reagan Wilson and Bruce Clayton. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and The Journal of Economic History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.