William T. L. Cox
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Patricia G. DevinePatrick S. ForscherE. Ashby PlantJennifer SheridanMolly CarnesAnna KaatzSteven D. HollonLyn Y. Abramson
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers)Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
William T. L. Cox
17 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Sociology and Political Science 833
- Social Psychology 453
- Gender Studies 386
- Clinical Psychology 170
- Cognitive Neuroscience 156
Countries citing papers authored by William T. L. Cox
This map shows the geographic impact of William T. L. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William T. L. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William T. L. Cox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William T. L. Cox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William T. L. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William T. L. Cox. The network helps show where William T. L. Cox may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William T. L. Cox
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William T. L. Cox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William T. L. Cox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William T. L. Cox. William T. L. Cox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 150 | |
| 7 | 138 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | 48 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking interventionbreakdown → | 747 |
| 15 | 84 | |
| 16 | 103 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | No simple answers on pricing. Comprehensive reform of chargemasters requires a single national policy. | 0 |
About William T. L. Cox
William T. L. Cox is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (386 citations), Social Psychology (453 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (833 citations). William T. L. Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Patricia G. Devine, Patrick S. Forscher, E. Ashby Plant, Jennifer Sheridan, Molly Carnes, Anna Kaatz, Steven D. Hollon, Lyn Y. Abramson, B. Michelle Peruche and Joanna Goplen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.