Colleen Smith

2.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
28 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Colleen Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education and Research and Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Colleen Smith has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in General Health Professions, 9 papers in Education and 6 papers in Research and Theory. Recurrent topics in Colleen Smith's work include Nursing education and management (6 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (4 papers). Colleen Smith is often cited by papers focused on Nursing education and management (6 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (4 papers). Colleen Smith collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Colleen Smith's co-authors include Brian Mullen, Rupert Brown, Amanda Kenny, Craig Phillips, Adrian Esterman, Paul Arbon, Franklin H.G. Bridgewater, Morgan Smith, Rasika Jayasekara and Lisa McKenna and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Nutrition, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Colleen Smith

27 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration

1992 865 citations Brian Mullen, Colleen Smith et al. profile →

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Colleen Smith	769	474	306	234	186	28	1.5k
Debra Gilin	553 0.7×	402 0.8×	364 1.2×	39 0.2×	99 0.5×	15	1.5k
Kathy Ahern	251 0.3×	326 0.7×	710 2.3×	152 0.6×	150 0.8×	23	1.6k
Luca Caricati	537 0.7×	416 0.9×	301 1.0×	81 0.3×	39 0.2×	74	1.2k
Donna S. Martsolf	600 0.8×	376 0.8×	493 1.6×	260 1.1×	38 0.2×	73	2.0k
Michael Clinton	366 0.5×	237 0.5×	668 2.2×	216 0.9×	118 0.6×	70	1.8k
Dawn Freshwater	429 0.6×	355 0.7×	912 3.0×	335 1.4×	218 1.2×	102	2.2k
Richard Lakeman	322 0.4×	493 1.0×	960 3.1×	203 0.9×	52 0.3×	118	2.4k
Arla Day	794 1.0×	578 1.2×	735 2.4×	53 0.2×	137 0.7×	19	1.8k
Rosemary Ricciardelli	1.8k 2.3×	382 0.8×	997 3.3×	120 0.5×	33 0.2×	277	3.5k
Ann Gallagher	231 0.3×	154 0.3×	922 3.0×	1.1k 4.5×	115 0.6×	168	2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Colleen Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colleen Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colleen Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colleen Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colleen Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colleen Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colleen Smith. The network helps show where Colleen Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Colleen Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Colleen Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Colleen Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Colleen Smith. Colleen Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

May, Esther, et al.. (2023). Applying Learning Principles Within Parent Education: Exploring Nurses’ Practice and Parents’ Experiences. Patient Preference and Adherence. Volume 17. 2949–2970. 1 indexed citations

Leach, Matthew, et al.. (2020). How nurses and other health professionals use learning principles in parent education practice: A scoping review of the literature. Heliyon. 6(3). e03564–e03564. 19 indexed citations

May, Esther, et al.. (2020). The invisible nature of learning: Patient education in nursing. Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia. 28(3). 341–345. 6 indexed citations

Jayasekara, Rasika, et al.. (2017). The effectiveness of clinical education models for undergraduate nursing programs: A systematic review. Nurse Education in Practice. 29. 116–126. 86 indexed citations

Jayasekara, Rasika, et al.. (2017). Clinical Education Models for Undergraduate Nursing Programs. 86–92.

Phillips, Craig, Amanda Kenny, Adrian Esterman, & Colleen Smith. (2013). A secondary data analysis examining the needs of graduate nurses in their transition to a new role. Nurse Education in Practice. 14(2). 106–111. 119 indexed citations

McKenna, Lisa, et al.. (2012). The effectiveness of simulation activities on the cognitive abilities of undergraduate third‐year nursing students: a randomised control trial. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 21(23-24). 3475–3484. 24 indexed citations

Smith, Morgan, Jane Warland, & Colleen Smith. (2012). An Innovative Strategy in Evaluation: Using a Student Engagement Framework to Evaluate a Role-Based Simulation. Journal of Nursing Education. 51(3). 151–154. 5 indexed citations

Smith, Colleen, et al.. (2011). A mixed method pilot study: The researchers’ experiences. Contemporary Nurse. 39(1). 31–35. 13 indexed citations

10.

Phillips, Craig, Amanda Kenny, Colleen Smith, & Adrian Esterman. (2011). Pre-registration paid employment choice: The views of newly qualified nurses. Nurse Education Today. 32(1). 10–14. 40 indexed citations

11.

Smith, Colleen. (2011). Why should we bother with assessment moderation?. Nurse Education Today. 32(6). e45–e48. 15 indexed citations

12.

Smith, Colleen & Marie Heartfield. (2009). Australian practice nurse immunisation scholarships: an evaluation study. Australian journal of advanced nursing. 27(1). 1 indexed citations

13.

Emden, Carolyn & Colleen Smith. (2004). NON-INTRUSIVE RESEARCH: IDEAS AND GUIDELINES FOR EXPEDIENT THESIS COMPLETION. Australian journal of advanced nursing. 22(1). 1 indexed citations

14.

Smith, Colleen, et al.. (2004). Information empowers but who is empowered?. Communication & Medicine. 1(2). 119–129. 6 indexed citations

15.

Tobin, Brian, et al.. (2003). Longitudinal and Horizontal Integration of Nutrition Science into Medical School Curricula. Journal of Nutrition. 133(2). 567S–572S. 18 indexed citations

16.

Arbon, Paul, Franklin H.G. Bridgewater, & Colleen Smith. (2001). Mass Gathering Medicine: A Predictive Model for Patient Presentation and Transport Rates. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 16(3). 150–158. 135 indexed citations

17.

Smith, Colleen, et al.. (1999). Best practice: What it is and what it is not. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 5(2). 100–105. 15 indexed citations

18.

Smith, Colleen, et al.. (1996). Discovering and affirming knowledge in nursing practice. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2(2). 63–70. 4 indexed citations

19.

Smith, Colleen, et al.. (1995). Advanced nursing practice: new ideas and new perspectives. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 21(6). 1037–1043. 50 indexed citations

20.

Mullen, Brian & Colleen Smith. (1990). Social Projection as a Function of Actual Consensus. The Journal of Social Psychology. 130(4). 501–506. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact