Anna Kaatz

3.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
25 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Anna Kaatz is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Kaatz has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Gender Studies, 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Anna Kaatz's work include Diversity and Career in Medicine (10 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (8 papers) and Mentoring and Academic Development (7 papers). Anna Kaatz is often cited by papers focused on Diversity and Career in Medicine (10 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (8 papers) and Mentoring and Academic Development (7 papers). Anna Kaatz collaborates with scholars based in United States, Poland and India. Anna Kaatz's co-authors include Molly Carnes, Elizabeth N. Chapman, Wairimu Magua, Jennifer Sheridan, Patricia G. Devine, Patrick S. Forscher, Carol Isaac, Cecilia E. Ford, Amarette Filut and Angela Byars‐Winston and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Anna Kaatz

25 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

Physicians and Implicit Bias: How Doctors May Unwittingly... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 2014 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna Kaatz United States 17 916 823 480 443 288 25 2.2k
Lorraine E. Ferris Canada 28 376 0.4× 595 0.7× 736 1.5× 441 1.0× 158 0.5× 90 2.6k
Carole J. Bland United States 21 630 0.7× 1.0k 1.2× 572 1.2× 103 0.2× 300 1.0× 43 2.0k
Lesley Doyal United Kingdom 26 392 0.4× 826 1.0× 1.3k 2.7× 566 1.3× 178 0.6× 94 3.0k
Parveen Ali United Kingdom 26 268 0.3× 341 0.4× 794 1.7× 555 1.3× 140 0.5× 132 2.2k
Linda H. Pololi United States 26 2.0k 2.2× 2.0k 2.4× 737 1.5× 174 0.4× 819 2.8× 55 3.1k
Lucy Frith United Kingdom 26 166 0.2× 1.0k 1.3× 459 1.0× 195 0.4× 121 0.4× 132 2.6k
Patricia M. McGovern United States 34 301 0.3× 872 1.1× 900 1.9× 1.4k 3.1× 342 1.2× 125 3.7k
Shiphra Ginsburg Canada 41 456 0.5× 3.8k 4.6× 1.4k 2.9× 175 0.4× 197 0.7× 121 5.0k
Alison Chapple United Kingdom 31 254 0.3× 757 0.9× 1.2k 2.6× 659 1.5× 324 1.1× 71 3.5k
Peggy L. Chinn United States 27 99 0.1× 427 0.5× 1.1k 2.2× 530 1.2× 245 0.9× 115 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Kaatz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Kaatz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Kaatz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Kaatz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Kaatz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Kaatz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Kaatz. The network helps show where Anna Kaatz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Kaatz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Kaatz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Kaatz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Kaatz. Anna Kaatz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pier, Elizabeth L., Joshua Raclaw, Molly Carnes, Cecilia E. Ford, & Anna Kaatz. (2019). Laughter and the Chair: Social Pressures Influencing Scoring During Grant Peer Review Meetings. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 34(4). 513–514. 4 indexed citations
2.
Pier, Elizabeth L., Markus Bräuer, Amarette Filut, et al.. (2018). Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115(12). 2952–2957. 99 indexed citations
3.
Sheridan, Jennifer, Julia N. Savoy, Anna Kaatz, et al.. (2017). Write More Articles, Get More Grants: The Impact of Department Climate on Faculty Research Productivity. Journal of Women s Health. 26(5). 587–596. 40 indexed citations
4.
Devine, Patricia G., Patrick S. Forscher, William T. L. Cox, et al.. (2017). A gender bias habit-breaking intervention led to increased hiring of female faculty in STEMM departments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 73. 211–215. 138 indexed citations
6.
Filut, Amarette, et al.. (2017). Network analysis of NIH grant critiques. 240–243. 2 indexed citations
7.
Pier, Elizabeth L., Joshua Raclaw, Anna Kaatz, et al.. (2016). ‘Your comments are meaner than your score’: score calibration talk influences intra- and inter-panel variability during scientific grant peer review. Research Evaluation. 26(1). 1–14. 36 indexed citations
8.
Kaatz, Anna, You-Geon Lee, Wairimu Magua, et al.. (2016). Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?. Academic Medicine. 91(8). 1080–1088. 111 indexed citations
10.
Kaatz, Anna, Wairimu Magua, D. R. Zimmerman, & Molly Carnes. (2014). A Quantitative Linguistic Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques From Investigators at One Institution. Academic Medicine. 90(1). 69–75. 62 indexed citations
11.
Kaatz, Anna, et al.. (2014). “Fair Play”: A Videogame Designed to Address Implicit Race Bias Through Active Perspective Taking. Games for Health Journal. 3(6). 371–378. 53 indexed citations
12.
Carnes, Molly, Patricia G. Devine, Linda Baier Manwell, et al.. (2014). The Effect of an Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Habit for Faculty at One Institution. Academic Medicine. 90(2). 221–230. 352 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Kaatz, Anna & Molly Carnes. (2014). Stuck in the Out-Group: Jennifer Can't Grow Up, Jane's Invisible, and Janet's Over the Hill. Journal of Women s Health. 23(6). 481–484. 44 indexed citations
14.
Kaatz, Anna, et al.. (2014). Threats to objectivity in peer review: the case of gender. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 35(8). 371–373. 91 indexed citations
15.
Chapman, Elizabeth N., Anna Kaatz, & Molly Carnes. (2013). Physicians and Implicit Bias: How Doctors May Unwittingly Perpetuate Health Care Disparities. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 28(11). 1504–1510. 862 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Isaac, Carol, et al.. (2013). A qualitative study of work-life choices in academic internal medicine. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 19(1). 29–41. 25 indexed citations
17.
Isaac, Carol, Anna Kaatz, & Molly Carnes. (2012). Deconstructing the Glass Ceiling. Sociology Mind. 2(1). 80–86. 12 indexed citations
18.
Isaac, Carol, Anna Kaatz, Barbara Lee, & Molly Carnes. (2012). An Educational Intervention Designed to Increase Women's Leadership Self-Efficacy. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 11(3). 307–322. 45 indexed citations
19.
Ƶondek, H., et al.. (1958). "Thyrogenic" Infantilism Displaying an Unusual Pattern of Thyroid Function. BMJ. 1(5070). 546–549. 3 indexed citations
20.
Ƶondek, H., et al.. (1953). PRECOCIOUS PUBERTY AND CHORIOEPITHELIOMA OF THE PINEAL GLAND WITH REPORT OF A CASE. Journal of Endocrinology. 10(1). 12–NP. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026