Jens Agerström
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Dan‐Olof RoothFredrik BjörklundRickard CarlssonSamantha SinclairMagnus CarlssonJohan IsraelssonJohan HerlitzTrevor Archer
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (18 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Applied PsychologyEuropean Heart JournalJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Partner nations
- SwedenAzerbaijan
In The Last Decade
Jens Agerström
45 papers receiving 997 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Sociology and Political Science 498
- Social Psychology 297
- Cognitive Neuroscience 227
- Applied Psychology 184
- Gender Studies 150
Countries citing papers authored by Jens Agerström
This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Agerström's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Agerström with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Agerström more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Agerström
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Agerström. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Agerström. The network helps show where Jens Agerström may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Agerström
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Agerström. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Agerström based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Agerström. Jens Agerström is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | Future-oriented people show stronger moral concerns | 3 |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 194 | |
| 15 | GENDER DIFFERENCES IN IMPLICIT MORAL ORIENTATION ASSOCIATIONS: THE JUSTICE AND CARE DEBATE REVISITED | 2 |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 66 | |
| 18 | Ethnicity and obesity: evidence of implicit work performance stereotypes in Sweden | 8 |
| 19 | Influence of affective personality and dilemma content on moral reasoning: Effect of gender | 4 |
| 20 | 21 |
About Jens Agerström
Jens Agerström is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Gender Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (18 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (184 citations), Gender Studies (150 citations) and Social Psychology (297 citations). Jens Agerström has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden and Azerbaijan. Frequent co-authors include Dan‐Olof Rooth, Fredrik Björklund, Rickard Carlsson, Samantha Sinclair, Magnus Carlsson, Johan Israelsson, Johan Herlitz, Trevor Archer, Birgitta Grahn and Araz Rawshani. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, European Heart Journal and Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.