William Odom
- Human-Computer Interaction top 0.05%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 106
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 35
- Persona Design and Applications 28
- Usability and User Interface Design 12
- Demography top 0.5%
- Technology Use by Older Adults 34
- Museology top 0.2%
-
- Personal Information Management and User Behavior 11
-
- Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development 9
-
- Green IT and Sustainability 13
William Odom
108 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Human-Computer Interaction 2.8k
- Demography 679
- Museology 170
- Information Systems and Management 299
- Management of Technology and Innovation 289
Countries citing papers authored by William Odom
This map shows the geographic impact of William Odom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Odom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Odom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Odom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Odom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Odom. The network helps show where William Odom may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Odom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 140 | |
| 16 | Designing for slowness, anticipation and re-visitation | 2014 | 3 |
| 17 | 2010 | 99 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 72 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 99 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 1 |
About William Odom
William Odom is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Demography, Information Systems and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Architecture, having authored 113 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (106 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (35 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (34 papers), Persona Design and Applications (28 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (13 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (12 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (11 papers) and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (2.8k citations), Demography (679 citations), Museology (170 citations), Information Systems and Management (299 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (289 citations). William Odom has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jodi Forlizzi, Ron Wakkary, Richard Banks, John Zimmerman, James Pierce, Eli Blevis, David Kirk, Abigail Sellen, Richard Harper and Audrey Desjardins. Their work appears in journals such as interactions, Human-Computer Interaction, Interacting with Computers, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction and Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.