James Pierce
- Human-Computer Interaction top 0.05%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 58
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 21
- Usability and User Interface Design 9
- Persona Design and Applications 7
-
- Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development 6
- Museology top 0.5%
-
- Green IT and Sustainability 17
-
- Technology Use by Older Adults 8
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 5
James Pierce
76 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
- Human-Computer Interaction 2.1k
- Management of Technology and Innovation 353
- Computer Science Applications 204
- Museology 102
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 325
Countries citing papers authored by James Pierce
This map shows the geographic impact of James Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Pierce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Pierce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Pierce. The network helps show where James Pierce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Pierce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 7 | Defect Detection in Additive Manufacturing Utilizing Long Pulse Thermography | 2018 | 1 |
| 8 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 66 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 11 | How Deep Is Your Love : Deep Narratives of Ensoulment and Heirloom Status | 2011 | 33 |
| 12 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 99 | |
| 14 | Numerical modeling of ferrous-ion oxidation rate in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 23270: optimization of culture conditions through statistically designed experiments. | 2002 | 5 |
| 15 | 2001 | 100 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 64 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 27 | |
| 20 | 1983 | 46 |
About James Pierce
James Pierce is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Science Applications, Management of Technology and Innovation, Demography and Safety Research, having authored 79 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (58 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (21 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (17 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (9 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (8 papers), Persona Design and Applications (7 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (6 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (2.1k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (353 citations), Computer Science Applications (204 citations), Museology (102 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (325 citations). James Pierce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Eric Paulos, William Odom, Phoebe Sengers, Carl DiSalvo, Eli Blevis, Erik Stolterman, Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir, Northrop Frye, Eric P. S. Baumer and Maria Håkansson. Their work appears in journals such as interactions, Journal of Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction and ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.