Doenja Oogjes
- Human-Computer Interaction top 0.5%
- Mechanical Engineering
- Sociology and Political Science
- Demography top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Ron WakkarySabrina HauserHenry LinWilliam OdomPeter‐Paul VerbeekCheng CaoHeidi BiggsIohanna Nicenboim
- Topics
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (33 papers)Interactive and Immersive Displays (11 papers)Design Education and Practice (9 papers)
- Journals
- ACM Transactions on Computer-Human InteractionHuman-Computer InteractionCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Doenja Oogjes
29 papers receiving 574 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Human-Computer Interaction 516
- Mechanical Engineering 91
- Sociology and Political Science 81
- Demography 80
- Cognitive Neuroscience 73
Countries citing papers authored by Doenja Oogjes
This map shows the geographic impact of Doenja Oogjes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doenja Oogjes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doenja Oogjes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Doenja Oogjes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doenja Oogjes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doenja Oogjes. The network helps show where Doenja Oogjes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Doenja Oogjes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Doenja Oogjes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Doenja Oogjes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Doenja Oogjes. Doenja Oogjes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 43 | |
| 19 | 57 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Doenja Oogjes
Doenja Oogjes is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Museology and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 34 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (33 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (11 papers) and Design Education and Practice (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (516 citations), Museology (50 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (55 citations). Doenja Oogjes has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ron Wakkary, Sabrina Hauser, Henry Lin, William Odom, Peter‐Paul Verbeek, Cheng Cao, Heidi Biggs, Iohanna Nicenboim, Audrey Desjardins and Miguel Bruns. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Human-Computer Interaction and CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.