William Monter

1.4k citations
42 papers · 371 indexed · h-index 10

William Monter

32 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers

William Monter
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • History 170
  • Classics 27
  • History and Philosophy of Science 31
  • Religious studies 31
  • Anthropology 51
Replace Lyndal Roper with:
Lyndal Roper United Kingdom
R. Po‐chia Hsia United States
Robert Tittler Canada
E. William Monter Philippines
Diarmaid MacCulloch United Kingdom
James Sharpe United Kingdom
Susan Mosher Stuard United States
Suzanne Fonay Wemple United States
John Mundy United States
Jonathan Barry United Kingdom
William Monter relative to Lyndal Roper United Kingdom Lyndal Roper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lyndal Roper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Monter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Monter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Monter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Monter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Monter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Monter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Monter. The network helps show where William Monter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 24 scholars most cited alongside William Monter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Monter Line = papers co-authored together William Monter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20145
2 20131
3 20120
4 20040
5 19990
6 19971
7 199712
8 199635
9
"Frontiers of Heresy. The Spanish Inquisition from the Basque Lands to Sicily", William Monter, Cambridge - New York - Port Chester - Melbourne - Sydney 1990 : [recenzja] / Andrzej Wyrobisz.
19951
10 19944
11 19921
12 199211
13 19921
14 19915
15 19892
16 19883
17
Protestantes franceses y tolerancia inquisitorial
19871
18 19872
19 19851
20 198488

About William Monter

William Monter is a scholar working on History, Classics, General Arts and Humanities, History and Philosophy of Science and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 42 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (15 papers), Historical Studies in Latin America (7 papers), European Political History Analysis (5 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (4 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (3 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (3 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers) and Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (170 citations), Classics (27 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (31 citations), Religious studies (31 citations) and Anthropology (51 citations). William Monter has collaborated with scholars based in Philippines, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Giovanni Levi, Lydia G. Cochrane, Penny Roberts, William G. Naphy, Hans Sebald, William J. Bouwsma, Jean‐Pierre Dedieu, Ole Peter Grell, Euan Cameron and Katalin Péter. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Sixteenth Century Journal, The English Historical Review and The Journal of Modern History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026