William G. Naphy
- History top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Clinical Psychology
- Anthropology
- Topics
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (7 papers)Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (4 papers)Historical Legal Studies and Society (3 papers)
- Cited by
- HistoryClassicsReligious studies
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William G. Naphy
14 papers receiving 74 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- History 49
- Sociology and Political Science 30
- Political Science and International Relations 23
- Clinical Psychology 10
- Anthropology 10
Countries citing papers authored by William G. Naphy
This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Naphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Naphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Naphy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Naphy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Naphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Naphy. The network helps show where William G. Naphy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William G. Naphy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William G. Naphy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William G. Naphy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William G. Naphy. William G. Naphy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | The Protestant Revolution: From Martin Luther to Martin Luther King Jr | 3 |
| 3 | La peste in Europa | 0 |
| 4 | Born to be Gay: Historia da Homossexualidade | 2 |
| 5 | Plague: Black Death and Pestilence in Europe | 5 |
| 6 | Calvin and the Consolidation of the Genevan Reformation: with a new preface | 1 |
| 7 | La Peste noire: Grandes peurs et epidemies 1345-1730 | 2 |
| 8 | Religion and superstition in reformation Europe | 14 |
| 9 | Sex Crimes from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment | 6 |
| 10 | Sodomy in early modern Geneva: various definitions, diverse verdicts | 3 |
| 11 | Church and state in Calvin's Geneva | 0 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | The Black Death : A History of the Plagues 1345-1730 | 7 |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 |
About William G. Naphy
William G. Naphy is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, History and Classics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 104 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (7 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (4 papers) and Historical Legal Studies and Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (49 citations), Classics (7 citations) and Religious studies (9 citations). William G. Naphy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William Monter, Penny Roberts, Robert M. Kingdon and Andrew Spicer. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Sixteenth Century Journal and French History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.