William J. Griffith

587 citations
22 papers · 208 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

William J. Griffith

19 papers receiving 160 citations

Peers

William J. Griffith
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Anthropology 32
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 15
  • Geophysics 39
  • Cultural Studies 23
  • Space and Planetary Science 3
Replace Hubert Howe Bancroft with:
Hubert Howe Bancroft
Jacqueline Beaujeu‐Garnier France
George Kish United States
Myriam Tarragó Argentina
Keith Lilley United Kingdom
Hans Bielenstein Russia
Clifton B. Kroeber United States
René Millon United States
Colin Graham United Kingdom
Donald C. Cutter United States
William J. Griffith relative to Hubert Howe Bancroft Hubert Howe Bancroft's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hubert Howe Bancroft · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William J. Griffith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Griffith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Griffith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Griffith. The network helps show where William J. Griffith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside William J. Griffith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William J. Griffith Line = papers co-authored together William J. Griffith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199952
2 197840
3 195432
4 195416
5 197211
6 19607
7 19717
8 19667
9
Management of the Space Resource--Space Cost Budgeting.
19854
10 19584
11 19674
12 19604
13 19604
14 19604
15 19664
16 19712
17 19532
18 19571
19 19531
20 19631

About William J. Griffith

William J. Griffith is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Demography and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 22 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cuban History and Society (3 papers), Latin American history and culture (3 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (2 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (2 papers), Historical Studies in Latin America (2 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (1 paper) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (32 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (15 citations), Geophysics (39 citations), Cultural Studies (23 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (3 citations). William J. Griffith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include O. Nigel Bolland, Sol Tax, Bruce E. Shaw, Christopher H. Scholz, W. A. C. Stewart, David Félix and David C. Marsh. Their work appears in journals such as Hispanic American Historical Review, International Migration Review, The Economic History Review, Geophysical Research Letters and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact