Geophysical Research Letters

47.6k papers and 1.9M indexed citations i.

About

The 47.6k papers published in Geophysical Research Letters in the last decades have received a total of 1.9M indexed citations. Papers published in Geophysical Research Letters usually cover Atmospheric Science (21.4k papers), Global and Planetary Change (16.2k papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (13.1k papers) specifically the topics of Climate variability and models (9.2k papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (8.8k papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (7.0k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geophysical Research Letters are C. T. Russell, John M. Wallace, Eric Rignot, F. M. Giorgi, Michael J. McPhaden, J. Lean, David W. J. Thompson, R. M. Thorne, U. S. Inan and Kevin E. Trenberth.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Geophysical Research Letters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Geophysical Research Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geophysical Research Letters.

Countries where authors publish in Geophysical Research Letters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geophysical Research Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geophysical Research Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geophysical Research Letters more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025