George Kish

606 citations
43 papers · 319 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

George Kish

35 papers receiving 222 citations

Peers

George Kish
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Geography, Planning and Development 61
  • Anthropology 35
  • History 35
  • History and Philosophy of Science 15
  • Economics and Econometrics 70
Replace Edmund W. Gilbert with:
Edmund W. Gilbert United Kingdom
Lawrence Rakestraw United States
W. G. Hoskins United States
Robin Butlin United Kingdom
John Leighly United States
John R. Stilgoe United States
M. J. Wise United Kingdom
Joseph E. Schwartzberg United States
David Hooson United States
Eric Kerridge United Kingdom
George Kish relative to Edmund W. Gilbert United Kingdom Edmund W. Gilbert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Edmund W. Gilbert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Kish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Kish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Kish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Kish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Kish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Kish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Kish. The network helps show where George Kish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside George Kish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Kish Line = papers co-authored together George Kish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198341
2 197635
3 196331
4 195530
5 197530
6 197328
7 197324
8 198211
9 197911
10
La carte : image des civilisations
19808
11 19538
12 19586
13 19586
14 19755
15 19694
16 19764
17
Bibliography of International Geographical Congresses, 1871-1976
19793
18 19683
19 19733
20 19532

About George Kish

George Kish is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science, Ecology, Archeology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 43 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geography and Cartography (9 papers), Russia and Soviet political economy (3 papers), Polar Research and Ecology (3 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (3 papers), Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (3 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (2 papers), Alexander von Humboldt Studies (2 papers) and History and Developments in Astronomy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (61 citations), Anthropology (35 citations), History (35 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (15 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (70 citations). George Kish has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ε. L. Jones, G. R. Crone, Gary S. Dunbar, William L. Thomas, Jean Gottmann, Raymond Lister, Roland J. Fuchs, Fred B. Kniffen, W. R. Mead and R. A. Skelton. Their work appears in journals such as Geographical Review, Geographical Journal, The Professional Geographer, Economic Geography and Isis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact