William Huber

1.5k citations
28 papers · 1.2k · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William Huber

25 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

William Huber
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Electrochemistry 188
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 419
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.0k
  • Materials Chemistry 580
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 292
Replace Yasuhiro Oda with:
Yasuhiro Oda Japan
Christian Urban Spain
J. D. Costa Portugal
Joan Manel Ramírez Spain
Jiang Zeng China
C. Barone Italy
Upendra N. Singh United States
Silvan Kretschmer Germany
Xiaoming Zhang China
William Huber relative to Yasuhiro Oda Japan Yasuhiro Oda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Yasuhiro Oda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Huber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Huber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Huber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Huber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Huber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Huber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Huber. The network helps show where William Huber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Huber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Huber Line = papers co-authored together William Huber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000351
2 2001276
3 2001153
4 2001116
5 199989
6 200149
7 200831
8 200131
9 201329
10 200421
11 200018
12 200313
13 20097
14 20246
15 20035
16 19994
17 20094
18 19944
19 20133
20
Epic spatialities: the production of space in Final Fantasy games
20093

About William Huber

William Huber is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Sociology and Political Science, Materials Chemistry and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (6 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (6 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (4 papers), Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings (4 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (4 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers) and Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (188 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (419 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.0k citations), Materials Chemistry (580 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (292 citations). William Huber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Thomas P. Moffat, D. Josell, Daniel Wheeler, Gery R. Stafford, Daniel Kelly, John E. Bonevich, D. Josell, T. P. Moffat, A. M. Goldman and Neil M. Zimmerman. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Physical Review Letters, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact