William G. Resh

21 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

William G. Resh
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Public Administration 162
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 101
  • Political Science and International Relations 85
  • Strategy and Management 54
  • Gender Studies 31
Replace Hyunkang Hur with:
Hyunkang Hur United States
Susan Corby United Kingdom
Brigid van Wanrooy Australia
Mingwei Liu China
Jens Mohrenweiser Germany
Michelle O’Sullivan Ireland
Janet C. Vinzant United States
Sarah Oxenbridge Australia
Dionne Pohler Canada
Zuzana Murdoch Norway
William G. Resh relative to Hyunkang Hur United States Hyunkang Hur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×25×
Hyunkang Hur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William G. Resh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Resh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Resh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Resh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Resh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Resh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Resh. The network helps show where William G. Resh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside William G. Resh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William G. Resh Line = papers co-authored together William G. Resh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015108
2 201738
3 201537
4 201624
5 202221
6 201418
7 201917
8 201914
9 202213
10 202310
11 20209
12 20205
13 20234
14 20214
15 20213
16 20192
17 20241
18 20201
19 20191
20 20161

About William G. Resh

William G. Resh is a scholar working on Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Law, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (12 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (6 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (5 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (162 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (101 citations), Political Science and International Relations (85 citations), Strategy and Management (54 citations) and Gender Studies (31 citations). William G. Resh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Tima T. Moldogaziev, Sergio Fernández, Zachary W. Oberfield, John D. Marvel, Bo Wen, Saba Siddiki, Patrick S. Roberts, Donald P. Moynihan, Esther García González and Stephanie J. Wong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Public Administration Review, Review of Public Personnel Administration, Public Management Review and Review of Policy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact