William Finzer

23 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

William Finzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Statistics and Probability 145
  • Computer Science Applications 96
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 51
  • Information Systems and Management 28
  • Education 79
Replace Theodosia Prodromou with:
Theodosia Prodromou Australia
Peter Boon Netherlands
Karen Hollebrands United States
Sayamindu Dasgupta United States
Philip Vahey United States
Ross Turner Australia
Rod Nason Australia
Judith S. Zawojewski United States
Hans-Stefan Siller Germany
Gilbert Greefrath Germany
William Finzer relative to Theodosia Prodromou Australia Theodosia Prodromou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Theodosia Prodromou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Finzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Finzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Finzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Finzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Finzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Finzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Finzer. The network helps show where William Finzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside William Finzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Finzer Line = papers co-authored together William Finzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201369
2 196533
3 201932
4 202231
5 201127
6 199517
7 199316
8 201716
9 202115
10 202214
11 198210
12 200710
13 20187
14 20236
15 19935
16 20155
17 20234
18
Data Moves: Restructuring Data for Inquiry in a Simulation and Data Analysis Environment.
20183
19 20223
20 20152

About William Finzer

William Finzer is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Computer Science Applications, Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology and Information Systems, having authored 24 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistics Education and Methodologies (14 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (4 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (3 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (2 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (2 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (1 paper) and Advanced Database Systems and Queries (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (145 citations), Computer Science Applications (96 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (51 citations), Information Systems and Management (28 citations) and Education (79 citations). William Finzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Michelle Hoda Wilkerson, Jie Chao, Laura Gould, Frieda Reichsman, Shiyan Jiang, Carolyn Penstein Rosé, Nicholas J. Horton, Clifford Konold, Michael Miller Yoder and Alexander Pollatsek. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematical Thinking and Learning, Statistics Education Research Journal, Education and Information Technologies, The American Journal of the Medical Sciences and British Journal of Educational Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact