William F. Moss
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 2%
- Applied Mathematics top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Computational Mechanics top 10%
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephen DemkoPhilip W. SmithGlenn P. ForneyChristopher CoxLisa BensonSherrill B. BiggersHong ZhangMarisa Orr
- Topics
- Experimental Learning in Engineering (6 papers)Engineering Education and Pedagogy (5 papers)Matrix Theory and Algorithms (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William F. Moss
20 papers receiving 402 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 220
- Applied Mathematics 130
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 80
- Computational Mechanics 79
- Mathematical Physics 76
Countries citing papers authored by William F. Moss
This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Moss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Moss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Moss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Moss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Moss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Moss. The network helps show where William F. Moss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William F. Moss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William F. Moss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William F. Moss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William F. Moss. William F. Moss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | Student-centered active, cooperative learning in engineering | 25 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | AC 2007-1563: ADAPTING AND IMPLEMENTING THE SCALE-UP APPROACH IN STATICS, DYNAMICS, AND MULTIVARIATE CALCULUS | 2 |
| 7 | Laptops in the Engineering and Science Classroom | 1 |
| 8 | Vertical Stabilization of a Rocket on a Movable Platform | 0 |
| 9 | Analyzing and Exploiting Numerical Characteristics of Zone Fire Models | NIST | 1 |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 241 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About William F. Moss
William F. Moss is a scholar working on Architecture, Media Technology and Numerical Analysis, having authored 24 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Learning in Engineering (6 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (5 papers) and Matrix Theory and Algorithms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (220 citations), Computational Mathematics (8 citations) and Numerical Analysis (73 citations). William F. Moss has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Demko, Philip W. Smith, Glenn P. Forney, Philip W. Smith, Christopher Cox, Lisa Benson, Sherrill B. Biggers, Hong Zhang, Marisa Orr and Matthew Ohland. Their work appears in journals such as Macromolecules, Polymer and Mathematics of Computation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.