William F. Dove
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 0.5%
- Aging top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.2%
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 48
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Digestive system and related health 15
- Oncology top 0.5%
-
- Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research 42
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 21
-
- Diatoms and Algae Research 20
-
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 18
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 13
- Protist diversity and phylogeny 12
- Co-authors
- Amy MoserHenry C. PitotCindy LuongoKaren A. GouldNorman DavidsonJ. David McDonaldAlexandra ShedlovskyKenneth W. Kinzler
- Journals
- Science (4 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (19 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
William F. Dove
176 papers receiving 12.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 1.2k
- Aging 303
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.4k
- Genetics 3.1k
- Oncology 3.0k
Countries citing papers authored by William F. Dove
This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Dove's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Dove with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Dove more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Dove
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Dove. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Dove. The network helps show where William F. Dove may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William F. Dove, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 2 | A simple, quantitative method using alginate gel to determine rat colonic tumor volume in vivo. | 2014 | 6 |
| 3 | 2007 | 109 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 98 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 58 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 13 | |
| 10 | Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics | 1994 | 8 |
| 11 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 21 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 21 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 35 | |
| 19 | 1971 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1971 | 82 |
About William F. Dove
William F. Dove is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research and Genetics, having authored 176 papers that have together received 12.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (48 papers), Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (42 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (21 papers), Diatoms and Algae Research (20 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (18 papers), Digestive system and related health (15 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (13 papers) and Protist diversity and phylogeny (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (1.2k citations), Aging (303 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.4k citations). William F. Dove has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Amy Moser, Henry C. Pitot, Cindy Luongo, Karen A. Gould, Norman Davidson, J. David McDonald, Alexandra Shedlovsky, Kenneth W. Kinzler, Bert Vogelstein and Li-Kuo Su. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.