William F. Dove
- Molecular Biology top 0.5%
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.2%
- Cancer Research top 1%
- Co-authors
- Amy MoserHenry C. PitotCindy LuongoKaren A. GouldNorman DavidsonJ. David McDonaldAlexandra ShedlovskyKenneth W. Kinzler
- Topics
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (48 papers)Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (42 papers)Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (21 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
William F. Dove
176 papers receiving 12.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
- Molecular Biology 7.0k
- Genetics 3.1k
- Oncology 3.0k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.4k
- Cancer Research 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by William F. Dove
This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Dove's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Dove with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Dove more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Dove
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Dove. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Dove. The network helps show where William F. Dove may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William F. Dove
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William F. Dove. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William F. Dove based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William F. Dove. William F. Dove is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | A simple, quantitative method using alginate gel to determine rat colonic tumor volume in vivo. | 6 |
| 3 | 109 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 98 | |
| 7 | 58 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics | 8 |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 82 |
About William F. Dove
William F. Dove is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research and Genetics, having authored 176 papers that have together received 12.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (48 papers), Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (42 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (1.2k citations), Aging (303 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.4k citations). William F. Dove has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Amy Moser, Henry C. Pitot, Cindy Luongo, Karen A. Gould, Norman Davidson, J. David McDonald, Alexandra Shedlovsky, Kenneth W. Kinzler, Bert Vogelstein and Li-Kuo Su. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.