James Amos‐Landgraf

1.8k citations
31 papers · 921 indexed · h-index 13

James Amos‐Landgraf

29 papers receiving 904 citations

Peers

James Amos‐Landgraf
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Genetics 446
  • Molecular Biology 502
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 126
  • Cancer Research 79
  • Oncology 140
Replace Nobuaki Wakamatsu with:
Nobuaki Wakamatsu Japan
Sharon L. Wenger United States
Luisa Luna Norway
Yuan Wei China
Ivanka Dimova Bulgaria
Ihtisham Bukhari China
Yuichi Kumaki Japan
F Deerberg Germany
Szymon Czauderna Poland
Archana Dhasarathy United States
James Amos‐Landgraf relative to Nobuaki Wakamatsu Japan Nobuaki Wakamatsu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Nobuaki Wakamatsu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Amos‐Landgraf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Amos‐Landgraf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Amos‐Landgraf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Amos‐Landgraf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Amos‐Landgraf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Amos‐Landgraf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Amos‐Landgraf. The network helps show where James Amos‐Landgraf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Amos‐Landgraf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Amos‐Landgraf Line = papers co-authored together James Amos‐Landgraf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20255
2 20250
3 20242
4 20241
5 20232
6 20222
7 202113
8 20201
9 20199
10 20192
11 201812
12 201717
13
Delayed and Aberrant Presentation of VX2 Carcinoma in a Rabbit Model of Hepatic Neoplasia.
20151
14
A simple, quantitative method using alginate gel to determine rat colonic tumor volume in vivo.
20146
15 201449
16 201121
17 2007109
18 2006229
19 199622
20
Chromosome breakage in Prader-Willi and Angelman syndrome deletions may involve recombination between a repeat at the proximal and distal breakpoints
19944

About James Amos‐Landgraf

James Amos‐Landgraf is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 921 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (7 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (5 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), Gut microbiota and health (5 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (3 papers), Digestive system and related health (3 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers) and Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (446 citations), Molecular Biology (502 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (126 citations). James Amos‐Landgraf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Huntington F. Willard, Charles E. Schwartz, John Longshore, Robert M. Plenge, William F. Dove, Robert D. Nicholls, Wayne Gottlieb, Theresa W. Depinet, Suzanne B. Cassidy and Daniel J. Driscoll. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Gastroenterology and Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026