Travis Proulx
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Steven J. HeineKathleen D. VohsMichael InzlichtEddie Harmon‐JonesMichael J. ChandlerWillem W. A. SleegersBrian D. OstafinIlan Dar‐Nimrod
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (22 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (19 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Travis Proulx
41 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Social Psychology 1.6k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.0k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 675
- Clinical Psychology 475
- Applied Psychology 425
Countries citing papers authored by Travis Proulx
This map shows the geographic impact of Travis Proulx's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Travis Proulx with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Travis Proulx more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Travis Proulx
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Travis Proulx. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Travis Proulx. The network helps show where Travis Proulx may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Travis Proulx
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Travis Proulx. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Travis Proulx based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Travis Proulx. Travis Proulx is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 46 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 249 | |
| 12 | 59 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 65 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 65 | |
| 17 | Jekyll & Hyde in the East & West: Cross-cultural variations in conceptions of self-unity | 2 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 74 | |
| 20 | The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivationsbreakdown → | 912 |
About Travis Proulx
Travis Proulx is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (22 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (19 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (425 citations), Social Psychology (1.6k citations) and General Decision Sciences (70 citations). Travis Proulx has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Steven J. Heine, Kathleen D. Vohs, Michael Inzlicht, Eddie Harmon‐Jones, Michael J. Chandler, Willem W. A. Sleegers, Brian D. Ostafin, Ilan Dar‐Nimrod, Ian Hansen and Ilja van Beest. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.