Catherine L. Reed
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 2%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- Co-authors
- Roberta L. KlatzkySusan J. LedermanMartha J. FarahValerie E. StoneJefferson D. GrubbNorman G. VinsonJames W. TanakaDaniel N. McIntosh
- Topics
- Action Observation and Synchronization (21 papers)Face Recognition and Perception (20 papers)Tactile and Sensory Interactions (19 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONENeuroImage
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Catherine L. Reed
80 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.7k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
- Social Psychology 1.1k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 475
- Human-Computer Interaction 290
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine L. Reed
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine L. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine L. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine L. Reed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine L. Reed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine L. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine L. Reed. The network helps show where Catherine L. Reed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine L. Reed
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine L. Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine L. Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine L. Reed. Catherine L. Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 105 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 161 | |
| 14 | 135 | |
| 15 | 168 | |
| 16 | 73 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 88 | |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | 95 |
About Catherine L. Reed
Catherine L. Reed is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 82 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Action Observation and Synchronization (21 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (20 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.7k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.2k citations) and Social Psychology (1.1k citations). Catherine L. Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Roberta L. Klatzky, Susan J. Lederman, Martha J. Farah, Valerie E. Stone, Jefferson D. Grubb, Norman G. Vinson, James W. Tanaka, Daniel N. McIntosh, Eric Halgren and Shy Shoham. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.