Jonathan Jong
Impact in
- Health top 2%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Cultural Differences and Values
Papers in ⓘ
- Health 27
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 26
-
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 13
- Co-authors
- Jamin Halberstadt (20 shared papers)Harvey Whitehouse (12 shared papers)Matthias Bluemke (10 shared papers)Christopher Kavanagh (6 shared papers)Ryan McKay (7 shared papers)Miguel Farias (4 shared papers)Christopher Mee (2 shared papers)Inti A. Brazil (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Religion Brain & Behavior (7 papers)PLoS ONE (4 papers)Scientific Reports (3 papers)Social Psychological and Personality Science (3 papers)Scientific Data (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Jong
76 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Health 392
- Social Psychology 708
- Applied Psychology 103
- Clinical Psychology 306
- Sociology and Political Science 617
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Jong
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Jong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Jong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Jong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Jong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Jong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Jong. The network helps show where Jonathan Jong may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Jong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 129 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 120 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 102 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 86 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 81 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 68 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 67 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 67 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 50 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 42 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 41 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 17 | 1978 | 24 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 16 |
About Jonathan Jong
Jonathan Jong is a scholar working on Health, Religious studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (26 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (22 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (13 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (12 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (12 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (392 citations), Social Psychology (708 citations), Applied Psychology (103 citations), Clinical Psychology (306 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (617 citations). Jonathan Jong has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Jamin Halberstadt, Harvey Whitehouse, Matthias Bluemke, Christopher Kavanagh, Ryan McKay, Miguel Farias, Christopher Mee, Inti A. Brazil, Jonathan A. Lanman and Joshua Conrad Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as Religion Brain & Behavior, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Social Psychological and Personality Science and Scientific Data.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.