W. van Rijswijk
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Food Science top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Marketing top 5%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Lynn J. FrewerNaomi EllemersDavide MenozziDaniel J. ShanefieldNick HopkinsW.J. HuiskampStephen ReicherS. Alexander Haslam
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers)Nuclear Physics and Applications (5 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers)
- Journals
- Physics Letters BJournal of the American Ceramic SocietyPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
W. van Rijswijk
23 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Sociology and Political Science 379
- Food Science 371
- Social Psychology 239
- Marketing 135
- Plant Science 107
Countries citing papers authored by W. van Rijswijk
This map shows the geographic impact of W. van Rijswijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. van Rijswijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. van Rijswijk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. van Rijswijk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. van Rijswijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. van Rijswijk. The network helps show where W. van Rijswijk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. van Rijswijk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. van Rijswijk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. van Rijswijk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. van Rijswijk. W. van Rijswijk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 72 | |
| 3 | 100 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | Emerging applications for traceability systems and implications for consumers | 3 |
| 6 | 166 | |
| 7 | 231 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 112 | |
| 13 | 82 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About W. van Rijswijk
W. van Rijswijk is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Radiation and Social Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (5 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (371 citations), Marketing (135 citations) and Ceramics and Composites (82 citations). W. van Rijswijk has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Lynn J. Frewer, Naomi Ellemers, Davide Menozzi, Daniel J. Shanefield, Nick Hopkins, W.J. Huiskamp, Stephen Reicher, S. Alexander Haslam, Juliet R. H. Wakefield and Jan Bruins. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters B, Journal of the American Ceramic Society and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.