W. T. Singleton

43 papers receiving 504 citations

Peers

W. T. Singleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 144
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 23
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 89
  • Social Psychology 199
  • Human-Computer Interaction 39
Replace David C. Nagel with:
David C. Nagel United States
K. D. DUNCAN United Kingdom
Yvette J. Tenney United States
V. David Hopkin Czechia
Dina Burkolter Germany
Stephen Dixon United States
Eric Min‐yang Wang Taiwan
Randall J. Mumaw United States
Esa M. Rantanen United States
Susan G. Hill United States
W. T. Singleton relative to David C. Nagel United States David C. Nagel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
David C. Nagel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. T. Singleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. T. Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. T. Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. T. Singleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. T. Singleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. T. Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. T. Singleton. The network helps show where W. T. Singleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside W. T. Singleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. T. Singleton Line = papers co-authored together W. T. Singleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Man-machine systems
1974210
2 197833
3
Measurement of Man at Work
197132
4
Risk and decisions
198731
5
The mind at work
198926
6
The Body at Work: Biological Ergonomics
198321
7 197318
8 198018
9 198917
10 196913
11 195413
12 197212
13 198212
14 202211
15 196711
16 20229
17 19659
18 19679
19 19607
20 19847

About W. T. Singleton

W. T. Singleton is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Social Psychology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Communication, having authored 51 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Safety Research (6 papers), Ergonomics and Human Factors (5 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (4 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (3 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers), Advanced Neural Network Applications (2 papers) and Machine Learning and ELM (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (144 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (23 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (89 citations), Social Psychology (199 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (39 citations). W. T. Singleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jan Fredrik Hovden, Wilson Lowrey, K. F. H. MURRELL, David Whitfield, Raúl Bescós, Mohamed El‐Sharkawy, Louise Belfield, Kevin Tsang, Zoë Brookes and Peter C. Whitfield. Their work appears in journals such as Ergonomics, Applied Ergonomics, Nature, British Journal of Psychology and The International Journal of Aging and Human Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact