Dina Burkolter

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
22 papers, 762 citations indexed

About

Dina Burkolter is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, Dina Burkolter has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 762 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Social Psychology, 9 papers in Applied Psychology and 7 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. Recurrent topics in Dina Burkolter's work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (12 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (9 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (7 papers). Dina Burkolter is often cited by papers focused on Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (12 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (9 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (7 papers). Dina Burkolter collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Dina Burkolter's co-authors include Annette Kluge, Björn Badura, Juergen Sauer, Wolfram Luther, Benjamin Weyers, Barbara Frank, Bertolt Meyer, Leon Urbas and Matthias Brand and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and Ergonomics.

In The Last Decade

Dina Burkolter

22 papers receiving 722 citations

Hit Papers

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 5... 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dina Burkolter Germany 10 422 134 79 76 75 22 762
Cheryl A. Bolstad United States 18 527 1.2× 151 1.1× 54 0.7× 107 1.4× 57 0.8× 40 893
Jennifer Fowlkes United States 14 447 1.1× 105 0.8× 45 0.6× 52 0.7× 91 1.2× 46 1.0k
Kip Smith United States 10 405 1.0× 143 1.1× 106 1.3× 44 0.6× 135 1.8× 43 858
Curt C. Braun United States 14 554 1.3× 66 0.5× 62 0.8× 52 0.7× 37 0.5× 35 793
Gavan Lintern United States 20 644 1.5× 134 1.0× 98 1.2× 88 1.2× 287 3.8× 102 1.3k
Barbara G. Kanki United States 14 339 0.8× 108 0.8× 42 0.5× 46 0.6× 36 0.5× 47 882
Alex W. Stedmon United Kingdom 19 456 1.1× 74 0.6× 123 1.6× 51 0.7× 80 1.1× 57 945
Michael A. Rupp United States 12 352 0.8× 68 0.5× 60 0.8× 75 1.0× 51 0.7× 31 851
Björn Badura Germany 4 304 0.7× 82 0.6× 74 0.9× 47 0.6× 58 0.8× 4 541
Susan G. Hill United States 12 615 1.5× 138 1.0× 113 1.4× 69 0.9× 120 1.6× 39 930

Countries citing papers authored by Dina Burkolter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Burkolter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Burkolter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Burkolter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Burkolter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Burkolter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Burkolter. The network helps show where Dina Burkolter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dina Burkolter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dina Burkolter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dina Burkolter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dina Burkolter. Dina Burkolter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Burkolter, Dina, Benjamin Weyers, Annette Kluge, & Wolfram Luther. (2013). Customization of user interfaces to reduce errors and enhance user acceptance. Applied Ergonomics. 45(2). 346–353. 11 indexed citations
2.
Burkolter, Dina & Annette Kluge. (2012). Process control and risky decision-making: moderation by general mental ability and need for cognition. Ergonomics. 55(11). 1285–1297. 7 indexed citations
3.
Kluge, Annette & Dina Burkolter. (2012). Enhancing Research on Training for Cognitive Readiness. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 7(1). 96–118. 5 indexed citations
5.
Kluge, Annette, Dina Burkolter, & Barbara Frank. (2012). “Being prepared for the infrequent”: A comparative study of two refresher training approaches and their effects on temporal and adaptive transfer in a process control task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 56(1). 2437–2441. 8 indexed citations
6.
Burkolter, Dina & Annette Kluge. (2011). Online consumer behavior and its relationship with socio¬demographics, shopping orientations, need for emotion, and fashion leadership. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 2. 20–28. 18 indexed citations
7.
Kluge, Annette, et al.. (2010). The interaction of drill and practice and error training with individual differences. Cognition Technology & Work. 13(2). 103–120. 9 indexed citations
8.
Kluge, Annette, Björn Badura, Leon Urbas, & Dina Burkolter. (2010). Violations-Inducing Framing Effects of Production Goals: Conditions under which goal setting leads to neglecting safety-relevant rules. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 54(21). 1895–1899. 4 indexed citations
9.
Kluge, Annette, et al.. (2010). Designing Training for Temporal and Adaptive Transfer: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Training Methods for Process Control Tasks. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 43(3). 327–353. 14 indexed citations
10.
Burkolter, Dina, Annette Kluge, & Matthias Brand. (2010). Individual Differences in Complex Task Performance: Interaction Effects of Risk-Taking Behavior and Cognitive Variables. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 54(27). 2333–2337. 1 indexed citations
12.
Weyers, Benjamin, Dina Burkolter, Annette Kluge, & Wolfram Luther. (2010). User-Centered Interface Reconfiguration for Error Reduction in Human-Computer Interaction. 52–55. 7 indexed citations
13.
Burkolter, Dina, Bertolt Meyer, Annette Kluge, & Juergen Sauer. (2010). Assessment of Structural Knowledge as a Training Outcome in Process Control Environments. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 52(1). 119–138. 4 indexed citations
14.
15.
Burkolter, Dina. (2010). Training in process control: supporting performance in consideration of operator characteristics. reroDoc Digital Library. 1 indexed citations
16.
Kluge, Annette, et al.. (2009). Designing training for process control simulators: a review of empirical findings and current practices. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 10(6). 489–509. 41 indexed citations
17.
Burkolter, Dina, et al.. (2009). Waste Water Treatment Simulation (WaTr Sim): Validation of a new process control simulation tool for experimental training research. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 53(26). 1969–1973. 1 indexed citations
19.
Sauer, Juergen, et al.. (2008). The effects of heuristic rule training on operator performance in a simulated process control environment. Ergonomics. 51(7). 953–967. 22 indexed citations
20.
Burkolter, Dina, et al.. (2006). Cognitive Requirement Analysis to Derive Training Models for Controlling Complex Systems.. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026