Stephen Dixon

1.5k total citations
26 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Stephen Dixon is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Surgery and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Dixon has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Social Psychology, 5 papers in Surgery and 5 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. Recurrent topics in Stephen Dixon's work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (12 papers), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (5 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (5 papers). Stephen Dixon is often cited by papers focused on Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (12 papers), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (5 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (5 papers). Stephen Dixon collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Stephen Dixon's co-authors include Christopher D. Wickens, Jason S. McCarley, Bobbie Seppelt, Juliana Goh, D. D. Richman, Nicholas R. Johnson, Michael R. Eccles, Paul F. Davis, Robert Walker and Daniel Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Nephrology and Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Dixon

22 papers receiving 953 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Dixon United States 11 825 267 260 138 99 26 1.0k
Esin Kırış United States 3 753 0.9× 155 0.6× 185 0.7× 100 0.7× 92 0.9× 5 871
Angelia Sebok United States 16 671 0.8× 137 0.5× 180 0.7× 76 0.6× 81 0.8× 54 921
Susan G. Hill United States 12 615 0.7× 87 0.3× 138 0.5× 80 0.6× 92 0.9× 39 930
Randall J. Mumaw United States 10 439 0.5× 93 0.3× 195 0.8× 58 0.4× 125 1.3× 41 707
Richard McMaster United Kingdom 9 683 0.8× 60 0.2× 248 1.0× 48 0.3× 124 1.3× 21 992
Kara A. Latorella United States 11 441 0.5× 58 0.2× 113 0.4× 124 0.9× 91 0.9× 32 911
Daniel Barber United States 13 490 0.6× 104 0.4× 99 0.4× 57 0.4× 26 0.3× 42 793
Dina Burkolter Germany 10 422 0.5× 51 0.2× 134 0.5× 35 0.3× 49 0.5× 22 762
Jennifer M. Riley United States 13 385 0.5× 94 0.4× 101 0.4× 72 0.5× 29 0.3× 32 543
Neelam Naikar Australia 17 763 0.9× 33 0.1× 426 1.6× 57 0.4× 138 1.4× 53 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Dixon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Dixon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Dixon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Dixon. The network helps show where Stephen Dixon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Dixon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Dixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Dixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Dixon. Stephen Dixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dixon, Stephen, Daniel Johnson, & Richard Batley. (2019). A job accessibility index to evaluate employment impacts in isolated regions now restored to the rail network. Transportation Planning and Technology. 42(5). 515–537. 1 indexed citations
2.
Dixon, Stephen. (2012). Beyond the seas. ANU Open Research (Australian National University).
3.
Dixon, Stephen. (2008). Mother. 1(1). 155–163.
4.
Dixon, Stephen, Christopher D. Wickens, & Jason S. McCarley. (2007). On the Independence of Compliance and Reliance: Are Automation False Alarms Worse Than Misses?. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 49(4). 564–572. 203 indexed citations
5.
Wickens, Christopher D. & Stephen Dixon. (2007). The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: a synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 8(3). 201–212. 295 indexed citations
6.
Dixon, Stephen. (2006). Imperfect Diagnostic Automation: How Adjusting Bias and Saliency Affects Operator Trust. 1 indexed citations
7.
Dixon, Stephen & Christopher D. Wickens. (2006). Automation Reliability in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Control: A Reliance-Compliance Model of Automation Dependence in High Workload. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 48(3). 474–486. 205 indexed citations
8.
Wickens, Christopher D., Stephen Dixon, & Nicholas R. Johnson. (2006). Imperfect Diagnostic Automation: An Experimental Examination of Priorities and Threshold Setting. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 50(3). 210–214. 5 indexed citations
9.
Wickens, Christopher D., et al.. (2005). Pilot Dependence on Imperfect Diagnostic Automation in Simulated UAV Flights: An Attentional Visual Scanning Analysis.. Journal of Bioresource Management. 818. 38 indexed citations
10.
Wickens, Christopher D., Stephen Dixon, & Bobbie Seppelt. (2005). Auditory Preemption versus Multiple Resources: Who Wins in Interruption Management?. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 49(3). 463–466. 33 indexed citations
11.
Dixon, Stephen, et al.. (2005). Mission Control of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Workload Analysis. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 47(3). 479–487. 94 indexed citations
12.
Dixon, Stephen, et al.. (2004). Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Flight Control: False Alarms versus Misses. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 48(1). 152–156. 32 indexed citations
13.
Dixon, Stephen, et al.. (2003). Comparing Quantitative Model Predictions to Experimental Data in Multiple-UAV Flight Control. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 47(1). 104–108. 29 indexed citations
14.
Walker, Robert, Stephen Dixon, Beate M. Rüger, et al.. (2001). Familial fibronectin glomerulopathy: analysis of chromosome 1q32 and uteroglobin gene loci in a large New Zealand family. Nephrology. 6(5). 191–197. 1 indexed citations
15.
Dixon, Stephen, et al.. (1989). Products from the sensitised photo‐oxidation of 2‐dimethylamino‐5,6‐dimethylpyrimidin‐4‐ol. Pesticide Science. 25(3). 255–260. 2 indexed citations
16.
Dixon, Stephen, et al.. (1987). Chlorophyll sensitised photodegradation of 2‐dimethylamino‐5, 6‐dimethylpyrimidin‐4‐ol. Pesticide Science. 21(2). 155–163. 5 indexed citations
17.
Richman, D. D. & Stephen Dixon. (1985). Comparative study of Cambodian, Hmong, and Caucasian infant and maternal perinatal profiles. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 30(6). 313–319. 15 indexed citations
18.
Dixon, Stephen, et al.. (1983). Dye‐sensitised photo‐oxidation of 2‐dimethylamino‐5,6‐ dimethylpyrimidin‐4‐01 in aqueous solution. Pesticide Science. 14(4). 444–448. 21 indexed citations
19.
Dixon, Stephen, et al.. (1980). Quite Contrary. Chicago Review. 31(3). 141–141. 1 indexed citations
20.
Dixon, Stephen, et al.. (1969). Die Euthanasie: ihre theologischen, medizinischen und juristischen Aspekte. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht eBooks. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026