W. John Curtis
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Dante CicchettiNirbhay N. SinghAnn S. MastenGiulio E. LancioniJudy SinghRobert G. WahlerAlan S. W. WintonKristen McAleavey
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
W. John Curtis
23 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 247
- Education 232
- Cognitive Neuroscience 231
- Social Psychology 221
Countries citing papers authored by W. John Curtis
This map shows the geographic impact of W. John Curtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. John Curtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. John Curtis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. John Curtis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. John Curtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. John Curtis. The network helps show where W. John Curtis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. John Curtis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. John Curtis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. John Curtis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. John Curtis. W. John Curtis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 44 | |
| 2 | 63 | |
| 3 | 127 | |
| 4 | 218 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | The developing brain and neural plasticity: Implications for normality, psychopathology, and resilience: Developmental neuroscience | 8 |
| 7 | 93 | |
| 8 | 88 | |
| 9 | 247 | |
| 10 | 86 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 151 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 127 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About W. John Curtis
W. John Curtis is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Developmental Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (63 citations) and Safety Research (138 citations). W. John Curtis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Dante Cicchetti, Nirbhay N. Singh, Ann S. Masten, Giulio E. Lancioni, Judy Singh, Robert G. Wahler, Alan S. W. Winton, Kristen McAleavey, Hollis A. Wechsler and Cynthia R. Ellis. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Developmental Psychology and Development and Psychopathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.