Vincenzo Crupi
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Katya TentoriMichel GonzálezAndrea IaconaDaniel N. OshersonGustavo CevolaniSelena RussoBranden FitelsonNicolao Bonini
- Topics
- Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (17 papers)Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (16 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Vincenzo Crupi
47 papers receiving 708 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Artificial Intelligence 396
- History and Philosophy of Science 242
- General Decision Sciences 219
- Philosophy 207
- Cognitive Neuroscience 100
Countries citing papers authored by Vincenzo Crupi
This map shows the geographic impact of Vincenzo Crupi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vincenzo Crupi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vincenzo Crupi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vincenzo Crupi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vincenzo Crupi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vincenzo Crupi. The network helps show where Vincenzo Crupi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vincenzo Crupi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vincenzo Crupi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vincenzo Crupi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vincenzo Crupi. Vincenzo Crupi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | A Unified Model of Entropy and the Value of Information. | 1 |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 70 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | Explaining the Conjunction Fallacy: Probability vs. Confirmation | 1 |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 54 | |
| 20 | 66 |
About Vincenzo Crupi
Vincenzo Crupi is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, History and Philosophy of Science and Family Practice, having authored 51 papers that have together received 758 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (17 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (16 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (219 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (242 citations) and Philosophy (207 citations). Vincenzo Crupi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Katya Tentori, Michel González, Andrea Iacona, Daniel N. Osherson, Gustavo Cevolani, Selena Russo, Branden Fitelson, Nicolao Bonini, Roberto Festa and Fabrizio Elia. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Review and Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.