Katya Tentori

1.6k total citations
49 papers, 881 citations indexed

About

Katya Tentori is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, General Decision Sciences and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Katya Tentori has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 881 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 17 papers in General Decision Sciences and 11 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Katya Tentori's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (17 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (14 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers). Katya Tentori is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (17 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (14 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers). Katya Tentori collaborates with scholars based in Italy, United States and Germany. Katya Tentori's co-authors include Vincenzo Crupi, Daniel N. Osherson, Nicolao Bonini, Michel González, Selena Russo, Branden Fitelson, Lynn Hasher, Cynthia P. May, Stefania Pighin and Nick Chater and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Psychological Review.

In The Last Decade

Katya Tentori

46 papers receiving 821 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katya Tentori Italy 16 361 332 227 195 149 49 881
Vincenzo Crupi Italy 15 396 1.1× 219 0.7× 242 1.1× 207 1.1× 100 0.7× 51 758
Ruma Falk Israel 17 201 0.6× 257 0.8× 149 0.7× 46 0.2× 144 1.0× 47 1.1k
Wolfgang Spohn Germany 14 432 1.2× 96 0.3× 201 0.9× 232 1.2× 68 0.5× 63 753
Michel González France 12 225 0.6× 221 0.7× 86 0.4× 63 0.3× 198 1.3× 18 809
Gerhard Schurz Germany 20 558 1.5× 79 0.2× 663 2.9× 384 2.0× 125 0.8× 142 1.4k
Branden Fitelson United States 18 580 1.6× 142 0.4× 564 2.5× 587 3.0× 148 1.0× 63 1.2k
Ellery Eells United States 17 336 0.9× 167 0.5× 423 1.9× 354 1.8× 86 0.6× 42 1.1k
Russell Revlin United States 12 247 0.7× 262 0.8× 70 0.3× 52 0.3× 111 0.7× 28 671
Jan Sprenger Netherlands 16 185 0.5× 46 0.1× 247 1.1× 214 1.1× 99 0.7× 65 736
Bernard Berofsky United States 7 86 0.2× 84 0.3× 93 0.4× 159 0.8× 143 1.0× 22 657

Countries citing papers authored by Katya Tentori

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katya Tentori's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katya Tentori with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katya Tentori more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katya Tentori

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katya Tentori. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katya Tentori. The network helps show where Katya Tentori may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katya Tentori

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katya Tentori. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katya Tentori based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katya Tentori. Katya Tentori is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kellen, David, Clintin P. Davis‐Stober, John C. Dunn, et al.. (2025). Discourse on measurement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 122(5). e2401229121–e2401229121. 1 indexed citations
2.
Davis‐Stober, Clintin P., Alexandra Sarafoglou, Balázs Aczél, et al.. (2025). How can we make sound replication decisions?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 122(5). e2401236121–e2401236121. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pighin, Stefania, et al.. (2023). Sensory and multisensory reasoning: Is Bayesian updating modality-dependent?. Cognition. 234. 105355–105355.
4.
Nelson, Jonathan D., et al.. (2022). The likelihood difference heuristic and binary test selection given situation-specific utilities.. Decision. 9(3). 285–319.
5.
Tentori, Katya, et al.. (2021). Interpolating causal mechanisms: The paradox of knowing more.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 150(8). 1500–1527. 6 indexed citations
6.
Nelson, Jonathan D., Vincenzo Crupi, Björn Meder, Gustavo Cevolani, & Katya Tentori. (2017). A Unified Model of Entropy and the Value of Information.. Cognitive Science. 1 indexed citations
7.
Pighin, Stefania, Vittorio Girotto, & Katya Tentori. (2017). Children’s quantitative Bayesian inferences from natural frequencies and number of chances. Cognition. 168. 164–175. 6 indexed citations
8.
Tentori, Katya, Vincenzo Crupi, & Silvia Dello Russo. (2013). On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: Confirmation versus probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 142(1). 141–58. 5 indexed citations
9.
Crupi, Vincenzo, Nick Chater, & Katya Tentori. (2012). New Axioms for Probability and Likelihood Ratio Measures. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 64(1). 189–204. 21 indexed citations
10.
Zhao, Jiaying, Vincenzo Crupi, Katya Tentori, Branden Fitelson, & Daniel N. Osherson. (2012). Updating: Learning versus supposing. Cognition. 124(3). 373–378. 15 indexed citations
11.
Tentori, Katya, Vincenzo Crupi, & Selena Russo. (2012). On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: Probability versus inductive confirmation.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 142(1). 235–255. 70 indexed citations
12.
Crupi, Vincenzo & Katya Tentori. (2010). Irrelevant Conjunction: Statement and Solution of a New Paradox. Philosophy of Science. 77(1). 1–13. 20 indexed citations
13.
Crupi, Vincenzo, et al.. (2010). Broadening the study of inductive reasoning: Confirmation judgments with uncertain evidence. Memory & Cognition. 38(7). 941–950. 14 indexed citations
14.
Crupi, Vincenzo & Katya Tentori. (2009). Explaining the Conjunction Fallacy: Probability vs. Confirmation. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 31(31). 254–254. 1 indexed citations
15.
Crupi, Vincenzo, Katya Tentori, & Luigi Lombardi. (2009). Pseudodiagnosticity revisited.. Psychological Review. 116(4). 971–985. 16 indexed citations
16.
Crupi, Vincenzo, Branden Fitelson, & Katya Tentori. (2008). Probability, confirmation, and the conjunction fallacy. Thinking & Reasoning. 14(2). 182–199. 54 indexed citations
17.
Crupi, Vincenzo, Katya Tentori, & Michel González. (2007). On Bayesian Measures of Evidential Support: Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Philosophy of Science. 74(2). 229–252. 122 indexed citations
18.
Tentori, Katya, Vincenzo Crupi, Nicolao Bonini, & Daniel N. Osherson. (2006). Comparison of confirmation measures. Cognition. 103(1). 107–119. 66 indexed citations
19.
Tentori, Katya, Nicolao Bonini, & Daniel N. Osherson. (2004). The conjunction fallacy: a misunderstanding about conjunction?. Cognitive Science. 28(3). 467–477. 66 indexed citations
20.
Savadori, Lucia, et al.. (2004). Trust and attitude in consumer food choices under risk. German Journal of Agricultural Economics. 53(8). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Vincenzo Crupi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ruma Falk Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wolfgang Spohn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michel González Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gerhard Schurz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Branden Fitelson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ellery Eells Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Russell Revlin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jan Sprenger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bernard Berofsky
Rankless by CCL
2026