Richard Pettigrew
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Hannes LeitgebØystein LinneboMichael G. TitelbaumJonathan WeisbergRachael BriggsIan James KiddJames LadymanHavi Carel
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (38 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (23 papers)Philosophy and History of Science (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCzechia
In The Last Decade
Richard Pettigrew
55 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Philosophy 930
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 490
- History and Philosophy of Science 433
- Artificial Intelligence 310
- Cognitive Neuroscience 300
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Pettigrew
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Pettigrew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Pettigrew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Pettigrew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Pettigrew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Pettigrew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Pettigrew. The network helps show where Richard Pettigrew may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Pettigrew
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Pettigrew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Pettigrew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Pettigrew. Richard Pettigrew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | Accuracy and the credence-belief connection | 90 |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | Deference Done Right | 55 |
| 18 | Epistemic Utility Theory | 2 |
| 19 | 128 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Richard Pettigrew
Richard Pettigrew is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and General Decision Sciences, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (38 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (23 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (433 citations), Philosophy (930 citations) and General Decision Sciences (139 citations). Richard Pettigrew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Hannes Leitgeb, Øystein Linnebo, Michael G. Titelbaum, Jonathan Weisberg, Rachael Briggs, Ian James Kidd, James Ladyman, Havi Carel, Josie McLellan and Alexander Bird. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, The Philosophical Review and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.