Veronica Hollinger
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
- Philosophy top 5%
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Papers in
-
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction 8
-
- Digital Games and Media 3
- Co-authors
- Gary K. Wolfe (1 shared paper)Gary Westfahl (1 shared paper)Brian Stableford (1 shared paper)Gwyneth Jones (1 shared paper)Andrew M. Butler (1 shared paper)Helen Merrick (1 shared paper)Edward James (1 shared paper)Mark Bould (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Science Fiction Studies (6 papers)Extrapolation (2 papers)Signs (1 paper)Science Fiction Film & Television (2 papers)DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Veronica Hollinger
12 papers receiving 89 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Cultural Studies 52
- Philosophy 55
- Literature and Literary Theory 47
- Gender Studies 15
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 7
Countries citing papers authored by Veronica Hollinger
This map shows the geographic impact of Veronica Hollinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Veronica Hollinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veronica Hollinger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Veronica Hollinger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Veronica Hollinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Veronica Hollinger. The network helps show where Veronica Hollinger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Veronica Hollinger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 64 | |
| 2 | Blood read : the vampire as metaphor in contemporary culture | 1997 | 36 |
| 3 | Queer Universes: Sexualities in Science Fiction | 2011 | 17 |
| 4 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 11 | Artificial Culture: Identity, Technology, and Bodies by Tama Leaver (review) | 2014 | 1 |
| 12 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0 |
About Veronica Hollinger
Veronica Hollinger is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 16 papers that have together received 149 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (8 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper), Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies (1 paper) and Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (52 citations), Philosophy (55 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (47 citations), Gender Studies (15 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (7 citations). Veronica Hollinger has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gary K. Wolfe, Gary Westfahl, Brian Stableford, Gwyneth Jones, Andrew M. Butler, Helen Merrick, Edward James, Mark Bould, Joan L. Slonczewski and Farah Mendlesohn. Their work appears in journals such as Science Fiction Studies, Extrapolation, Signs, Science Fiction Film & Television and DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.